This documentation provides details for all of the ISLE language
features, and detailed rationale for why many of them are designed in
the way that they are. It is hopefully both a reasonable tutorial and
reference for someone looking to understand the DSL.
Note that this documentation is separate from and orthogonal to the
work to document the Cranelift bindings and integration work that
@fitzgen has covered well in #3556. This document can link to that one
and vice-versa once they are both in-tree.
This starts moving over some sign/zero-extend helpers also present in
lowering in Rust. Otherwise this is a relatively unsurprising transition
with the various cases of the instructions mapping well to ISLE
utilities.
This commit migrates the `imul` clif instruction lowering for AArch64 to
ISLE. This is a relatively complicated instruction with lots of special
cases due to the simd proposal for wasm. Like x64, however, the special
casing lends itself to ISLE quite well and the lowerings here in theory
are pretty straightforward.
The main gotcha of this commit is that this encounters a unique
situation which hasn't been encountered yet with other lowerings, namely
the `Umlal32` instruction used in the implementation of `i64x2.mul` is
unique in the `VecRRRLongOp` class of instructions in that it both reads
and writes the destination register (`use_mod` instead of simply
`use_def`). This meant that I needed to add another helper in ISLe for
creating a `vec_rrrr_long` instruction (despite this enum variant not
actually existing) which implicitly moves the first operand into the
destination before issuing the actual `VecRRRLong` instruction.
Following up on WebAssembly/wasi-sdk#210, this makes the trap message
for `unreachable` traps more descriptive of what actually caused the
trap, so that it doesn't sound like maybe Wasmtime itself executed a
`unreachable!()` macro in Rust.
Before:
```
wasm trap: unreachable
wasm backtrace:
[...]
```
After:
```
wasm trap: wasm `unreachable` instruction executed
wasm backtrace:
[...]
```
This takes an IntCC for the comparison to do, though panics for Signed*
since memcmp is an unsigned comparison. Currently it's most useful for
(Not)Equal, but once big-endian loads are implemented it'll be able to
support the other Unsigned* comparisons nicely on more than just bytes.
The comment says the enum is "likely to grow" and the function's been in libc since C89, so hopefully this is ok.
I'd like to use it for emitting things like array equality.
In [this
comment](https://github.com/bytecodealliance/wasmtime/pull/3545#discussion_r756284757)
I noted a potential subtle issue with the way that a few rules were
written that is fine now but could cause some unexpected pain when we
get around to verification.
Specifically, a set of rules of the form
```
(rule (A (B _)) (C))
(rule (A _) (D))
```
should, under any reasonable "default" rule ordering scheme, fire the
more specific rule `(A (B _))` when applicable, in preference to the
second "fallback" rule.
However, for future verification-specific applications of ISLE, we want
to ensure the property that a rule's meaning/validity is not dependent
on being overridden by more specific rules. In other words, if a rule
specifies a rewrite, that rewrite should always be correct; and choosing
a more specific rule can give a *better* compilation (better generated
code) but should not be necessary for correctness.
This is an admittedly under-documented part of the language, though in the
pending #3560 I added a note about rule ordering being a heuristic that
should hopefully make this slightly clearer. Ultimately I want to have
tests that choose non-default rule orderings and differentially fuzz in
order to be sure that we're following this principle; and of course once
we're actually doing verification, we'll catch issues like this upfront.
Apologies for the subtle footgun here and hopefully the reasoning is
clear enough :-)
This fixes a fuzz issue discovered over the weekend where stores with
different values for nan canonicalization may produce different results.
This is expected, however, so the fix for differential execution is to
always enable nan canonicalization.
As reported in #3173, the `select` instruction fails an assertion when it is given `v128` types as operands. This change relaxes the assertion to allow the same type of XMM move that occurs for the f32 and f64 types. This fixes#3173 in the old `lower.rs` code temporarily until the relatively complex `select` lowering can be ported to ISLE.
This commit adds a test from #3337 which is an issue that was fixed
in #3506 due to moving `imul` lowering rules to ISLE which fixed the
underlying issue of accidentally not falling through to the necessary
case for general `i64x2.mul` multiplication.
Closes#3337
This commit is the first "meaty" instruction added to ISLE for the
AArch64 backend. I chose to pick the first two in the current lowering's
`match` statement, `isub` and `iadd`. These two turned out to be
particularly interesting for a few reasons:
* Both had clearly migratable-to-ISLE behavior along the lines of
special-casing per type. For example 128-bit and vector arithmetic
were both easily translateable.
* The `iadd` instruction has special cases for fusing with a
multiplication to generate `madd` which is expressed pretty easily in
ISLE.
* Otherwise both instructions had a number of forms where they attempted
to interpret the RHS as various forms of constants, extends, or
shifts. There's a bit of a design space of how best to represent this
in ISLE and what I settled on was to have a special case for each form
of instruction, and the special cases are somewhat duplicated between
`iadd` and `isub`. There's custom "extractors" for the special cases
and instructions that support these special cases will have an
`rule`-per-case.
Overall I think the ISLE transitioned pretty well. I don't think that
the aarch64 backend is going to follow the x64 backend super closely,
though. For example the x64 backend is having a helper-per-instruction
at the moment but with AArch64 it seems to make more sense to only have
a helper-per-enum-variant-of-`MInst`. This is because the same
instruction (e.g. `ALUOp::Sub32`) can be expressed with multiple
different forms depending on the payload.
It's worth noting that the ISLE looks like it's a good deal larger than
the code actually being removed from lowering as part of this commit. I
think this is deceptive though because a lot of the logic in
`put_input_in_rse_imm12_maybe_negated` and `alu_inst_imm12` is being
inlined into the ISLE definitions for each instruction instead of having
it all packed into the helper functions. Some of the "boilerplate" here
is the addition of various ISLE utilities as well.
This also fixes a bug where `movsd` was incorrectly used with a memory
operand for `insertlane`, causing it to actually zero the upper bits
instead of preserving them.
Note that the insertlane logic still exists in `lower.rs` because it's
used as a helper for a few other instruction lowerings which aren't
migrated to ISLE yet. This commit also adds a helper in ISLE itself for
those other lowerings to use when they get implemented.
Closes#3216
* aarch64: Initial work to transition backend to ISLE
This commit is what is hoped to be the initial commit towards migrating
the aarch64 backend to ISLE. There's seemingly a lot of changes here but
it's intended to largely be code motion. The current thinking is to
closely follow the x64 backend for how all this is handled and
organized.
Major changes in this PR are:
* The `Inst` enum is now defined in ISLE. This avoids having to define
it in two places (once in Rust and once in ISLE). I've preserved all
the comments in the ISLE and otherwise this isn't actually a
functional change from the Rust perspective, it's still the same enum
according to Rust.
* Lots of little enums and things were moved to ISLE as well. As with
`Inst` their definitions didn't change, only where they're defined.
This will give future ISLE PRs access to all these operations.
* Initial code for lowering `iconst`, `null`, and `bconst` are
implemented. Ironically none of this is actually used right now
because constant lowering is handled in `put_input_in_regs` which
specially handles constants. Nonetheless I wanted to get at least
something simple working which shows off how to special case various
things that are specific to AArch64. In a future PR I plan to hook up
const-lowering in ISLE to this path so even though
`iconst`-the-clif-instruction is never lowered this should use the
const lowering defined in ISLE rather than elsewhere in the backend
(eventually leading to the deletion of the non-ISLE lowering).
* The `IsleContext` skeleton is created and set up for future additions.
* Some code for ISLE that's shared across all backends now lives in
`isle_prelude_methods!()` and is deduplicated between the AArch64
backend and the x64 backend.
* Register mapping is tweaked to do the same thing for AArch64 that it
does for x64. Namely mapping virtual registers is supported instead of
just virtual to machine registers.
My main goal with this PR was to get AArch64 into a place where new
instructions can be added with relative ease. Additionally I'm hoping to
figure out as part of this change how much to share for ISLE between
AArch64 and x64 (and other backends).
* Don't use priorities with rules
* Update .gitattributes with concise syntax
* Deduplicate some type definitions
* Rebuild ISLE
* Move isa::isle to machinst::isle
Peepmatic was an early attempt at a DSL for peephole optimizations, with the
idea that maybe sometime in the future we could user it for instruction
selection as well. It didn't really pan out, however:
* Peepmatic wasn't quite flexible enough, and adding new operators or snippets
of code implemented externally in Rust was a bit of a pain.
* The performance was never competitive with the hand-written peephole
optimizers. It was *very* size efficient, but that came at the cost of
run-time efficiency. Everything was table-based and interpreted, rather than
generating any Rust code.
Ultimately, because of these reasons, we never turned Peepmatic on by default.
These days, we just landed the ISLE domain-specific language, and it is better
suited than Peepmatic for all the things that Peepmatic was originally designed
to do. It is more flexible and easy to integrate with external Rust code. It is
has better time efficiency, meeting or even beating hand-written code. I think a
small part of the reason why ISLE excels in these things is because its design
was informed by Peepmatic's failures. I still plan on continuing Peepmatic's
mission to make Cranelift's peephole optimizer passes generated from DSL rewrite
rules, but using ISLE instead of Peepmatic.
Thank you Peepmatic, rest in peace!
