* Upgrade wasm-tools crates, namely the component model This commit pulls in the latest versions of all of the `wasm-tools` family of crates. There were two major changes that happened in `wasm-tools` in the meantime: * bytecodealliance/wasm-tools#697 - this commit introduced a new API for more efficiently reading binary operators from a wasm binary. The old `Operator`-based reading was left in place, however, and continues to be what Wasmtime uses. I hope to update Wasmtime in a future PR to use this new API, but for now the biggest change is... * bytecodealliance/wasm-tools#703 - this commit was a major update to the component model AST. This commit almost entirely deals with the fallout of this change. The changes made to the component model were: 1. The `unit` type no longer exists. This was generally a simple change where the `Unit` case in a few different locations were all removed. 2. The `expected` type was renamed to `result`. This similarly was relatively lightweight and mostly just a renaming on the surface. I took this opportunity to rename `val::Result` to `val::ResultVal` and `types::Result` to `types::ResultType` to avoid clashing with the standard library types. The `Option`-based types were handled with this as well. 3. The payload type of `variant` and `result` types are now optional. This affected many locations that calculate flat type representations, ABI information, etc. The `#[derive(ComponentType)]` macro now specifically handles Rust-defined `enum` types which have no payload to the equivalent in the component model. 4. Functions can now return multiple parameters. This changed the signature of invoking component functions because the return value is now bound by `ComponentNamedList` (renamed from `ComponentParams`). This had a large effect in the tests, fuzz test case generation, etc. 5. Function types with 2-or-more parameters/results must uniquely name all parameters/results. This mostly affected the text format used throughout the tests. I haven't added specifically new tests for multi-return but I changed a number of tests to use it. Additionally I've updated the fuzzers to all exercise multi-return as well so I think we should get some good coverage with that. * Update version numbers * Use crates.io
About
This crate is the Rust embedding API for the Wasmtime project: a cross-platform engine for running WebAssembly programs. Notable features of Wasmtime are:
-
Fast. Wasmtime is built on the optimizing Cranelift code generator to quickly generate high-quality machine code either at runtime or ahead-of-time. Wasmtime's runtime is also optimized for cases such as efficient instantiation, low-overhead transitions between the embedder and wasm, and scalability of concurrent instances.
-
Secure. Wasmtime's development is strongly focused on the correctness of its implementation with 24/7 fuzzing donated by Google's OSS Fuzz, leveraging Rust's API and runtime safety guarantees, careful design of features and APIs through an RFC process, a security policy in place for when things go wrong, and a release policy for patching older versions as well. We follow best practices for defense-in-depth and known protections and mitigations for issues like Spectre. Finally, we're working to push the state-of-the-art by collaborating with academic researchers to formally verify critical parts of Wasmtime and Cranelift.
-
Configurable. Wastime supports a rich set of APIs and build time configuration to provide many options such as further means of restricting WebAssembly beyond its basic guarantees such as its CPU and Memory consumption. Wasmtime also runs in tiny environments all the way up to massive servers with many concurrent instances.
-
WASI. Wasmtime supports a rich set of APIs for interacting with the host environment through the WASI standard.
-
Standards Compliant. Wasmtime passes the official WebAssembly test suite, implements the official C API of wasm, and implements future proposals to WebAssembly as well. Wasmtime developers are intimately engaged with the WebAssembly standards process all along the way too.
Example
An example of using the Wasmtime embedding API for running a small WebAssembly module might look like:
use anyhow::Result;
use wasmtime::*;
fn main() -> Result<()> {
// Modules can be compiled through either the text or binary format
let engine = Engine::default();
let wat = r#"
(module
(import "host" "hello" (func $host_hello (param i32)))
(func (export "hello")
i32.const 3
call $host_hello)
)
"#;
let module = Module::new(&engine, wat)?;
// Create a `Linker` which will be later used to instantiate this module.
// Host functionality is defined by name within the `Linker`.
let mut linker = Linker::new(&engine);
linker.func_wrap("host", "hello", |caller: Caller<'_, u32>, param: i32| {
println!("Got {} from WebAssembly", param);
println!("my host state is: {}", caller.data());
})?;
// All wasm objects operate within the context of a "store". Each
// `Store` has a type parameter to store host-specific data, which in
// this case we're using `4` for.
let mut store = Store::new(&engine, 4);
let instance = linker.instantiate(&mut store, &module)?;
let hello = instance.get_typed_func::<(), (), _>(&mut store, "hello")?;
// And finally we can call the wasm!
hello.call(&mut store, ())?;
Ok(())
}
More examples and information can be found in the wasmtime crate's online
documentation as well.
Documentation
📚 Read the Wasmtime guide here! 📚
The wasmtime guide is the best starting point to learn about what Wasmtime can do for you or help answer your questions about Wasmtime. If you're curious in contributing to Wasmtime, it can also help you do that!