Files
wasmtime/cranelift
Chris Fallin 77ed861857 Start of significant rework: compile to a trie, not an FSM, and handle rule priorities appropriately.
See long block comment in codegen.rs. In brief, I think we actually want
to compile to a trie with priority-intervals, a sort of hybrid of a
priority tree and a trie representing decisions keyed on match-ops
(PatternInsts).

The reasons are:

1. The lexicographic ordering that is fundamental to the FSM-building in
   the Peepmatic view of the problem is sort of fundamentally limited
   w.r.t. our notion of rule priorities. See the example in the block
   comment.

2. While the FSM is nice for interpreter-based execution, when compiling
   to a language with structured control flow, what we really want is a
   tree; otherwise, if we want to form DAGs to share substructure, we
   need something like a "diamond-recovery" algorithm that finds common
   suffixes of *input match-op sequences*, and then we need to
   incorporate something like phi-nodes in order to allow captures from
   either side of the diamond to be used.

3. One of the main advantages of the automaton/transducer approach,
   namely sharing suffixes of the *output* sequence (emitting partial
   output at each state transition), is unfortunately not applicable if
   we allow the overall function to be partial. Otherwise, there is
   always the possibility that we fail at the last match op, so we
   cannot allow any external constructors to be called until we reach
   the final state anyway.

4. Pragmatically, I found I was having to significantly edit the
   peepmatic_automata implementation to adapt to this use-case
   (compilation to Rust), and it seemed more practical to design the
   data structure we want than to try to shoehorn the existing thing
   into the new problem.

WIP, hopefully working soon.
2021-11-11 15:56:54 -08:00
..
2021-10-29 09:09:35 -05:00
2021-10-29 09:09:35 -05:00
2021-10-29 09:09:35 -05:00
2021-10-29 09:09:35 -05:00
2021-11-02 12:08:30 -05:00
2021-10-29 09:09:35 -05:00
2021-10-29 09:09:35 -05:00
2021-11-02 12:08:30 -05:00
2021-11-01 18:19:59 +01:00
2021-11-02 12:08:30 -05:00
2021-10-10 14:43:55 +02:00
2021-09-29 16:13:46 +02:00
2021-10-29 09:09:35 -05:00
2021-10-29 09:09:35 -05:00
2021-11-02 12:08:30 -05:00
2021-01-25 15:29:51 -08:00

Cranelift Code Generator

A Bytecode Alliance project

Cranelift is a low-level retargetable code generator. It translates a target-independent intermediate representation into executable machine code.

Build Status Fuzzit Status Chat Minimum rustc 1.37 Documentation Status

For more information, see the documentation.

For an example of how to use the JIT, see the JIT Demo, which implements a toy language.

For an example of how to use Cranelift to run WebAssembly code, see Wasmtime, which implements a standalone, embeddable, VM using Cranelift.

Status

Cranelift currently supports enough functionality to run a wide variety of programs, including all the functionality needed to execute WebAssembly MVP functions, although it needs to be used within an external WebAssembly embedding to be part of a complete WebAssembly implementation.

The x86-64 backend is currently the most complete and stable; other architectures are in various stages of development. Cranelift currently supports both the System V AMD64 ABI calling convention used on many platforms and the Windows x64 calling convention. The performance of code produced by Cranelift is not yet impressive, though we have plans to fix that.

The core codegen crates have minimal dependencies, support no_std mode (see below), and do not require any host floating-point support, and do not use callstack recursion.

Cranelift does not yet perform mitigations for Spectre or related security issues, though it may do so in the future. It does not currently make any security-relevant instruction timing guarantees. It has seen a fair amount of testing and fuzzing, although more work is needed before it would be ready for a production use case.

Cranelift's APIs are not yet stable.

Cranelift currently requires Rust 1.37 or later to build.

Contributing

If you're interested in contributing to Cranelift: thank you! We have a contributing guide which will help you getting involved in the Cranelift project.

Planned uses

Cranelift is designed to be a code generator for WebAssembly, but it is general enough to be useful elsewhere too. The initial planned uses that affected its design are:

Building Cranelift

Cranelift uses a conventional Cargo build process.

Cranelift consists of a collection of crates, and uses a Cargo Workspace, so for some cargo commands, such as cargo test, the --all is needed to tell cargo to visit all of the crates.

test-all.sh at the top level is a script which runs all the cargo tests and also performs code format, lint, and documentation checks.

Building with no_std

The following crates support `no_std`, although they do depend on liballoc:

  • cranelift-entity
  • cranelift-bforest
  • cranelift-codegen
  • cranelift-frontend
  • cranelift-native
  • cranelift-wasm
  • cranelift-module
  • cranelift-preopt
  • cranelift

To use no_std mode, disable the std feature and enable the core feature. This currently requires nightly rust.

For example, to build `cranelift-codegen`:

cd cranelift-codegen
cargo build --no-default-features --features core

Or, when using cranelift-codegen as a dependency (in Cargo.toml):

[dependency.cranelift-codegen]
...
default-features = false
features = ["core"]

no_std support is currently "best effort". We won't try to break it, and we'll accept patches fixing problems, however we don't expect all developers to build and test no_std when submitting patches. Accordingly, the ./test-all.sh script does not test no_std.

There is a separate ./test-no_std.sh script that tests the no_std support in packages which support it.

It's important to note that cranelift still needs liballoc to compile. Thus, whatever environment is used must implement an allocator.

Also, to allow the use of HashMaps with no_std, an external crate called hashmap_core is pulled in (via the core feature). This is mostly the same as std::collections::HashMap, except that it doesn't have DOS protection. Just something to think about.

Log configuration

Cranelift uses the log crate to log messages at various levels. It doesn't specify any maximal logging level, so embedders can choose what it should be; however, this can have an impact of Cranelift's code size. You can use log features to reduce the maximum logging level. For instance if you want to limit the level of logging to warn messages and above in release mode:

[dependency.log]
...
features = ["release_max_level_warn"]

Editor Support

Editor support for working with Cranelift IR (clif) files: