Nick Fitzgerald 2e48babf23 cranelift-wasm: Add a bounds-checking optimization for dynamic memories and guard pages (#6031)
* cranelift-wasm: Add a bounds-checking optimization for dynamic memories and guard pages

This is a new special case for when we know that there are enough guard pages to
cover the memory access's offset and access size.

The precise should-we-trap condition is

    index + offset + access_size > bound

However, if we instead check only the partial condition

    index > bound

then the most out of bounds that the access can be, while that partial check
still succeeds, is `offset + access_size`.

However, when we have a guard region that is at least as large as `offset +
access_size`, we can rely on the virtual memory subsystem handling these
out-of-bounds errors at runtime. Therefore, the partial `index > bound` check is
sufficient for this heap configuration.

Additionally, this has the advantage that a series of Wasm loads that use the
same dynamic index operand but different static offset immediates -- which is a
common code pattern when accessing multiple fields in the same struct that is in
linear memory -- will all emit the same `index > bound` check, which we can GVN.

* cranelift: Add WAT tests for accessing dynamic memories with the same index but different offsets

The bounds check comparison is GVN'd but we still branch on values we should
know will always be true if we get this far in the code. This is actual `br_if`s
in the non-Spectre code and `select_spectre_guard`s that we should know will
always go a certain way if we have Spectre mitigations enabled.

Improving the non-Spectre case is pretty straightforward: walk the dominator
tree and remember which values we've already branched on at this point, and
therefore we can simplify any further conditional branches on those same values
into direct jumps.

Improving the Spectre case requires something that is morally the same, but has
a few snags:

* We don't have actual `br_if`s to determine whether the bounds checking
  condition succeeded or not. We need to instead reason about dominating
  `select_spectre_guard; {load, store}` instruction pairs.

* We have to be SUPER careful about reasoning "through" `select_spectre_guard`s.
  Our general rule is never to do that, since it could break the speculative
  execution sandboxing that the instruction is designed for.
2023-03-17 19:06:19 +00:00
2023-03-15 22:14:38 +00:00
2020-02-28 09:16:05 -08:00
2023-03-06 23:47:34 +00:00

wasmtime

A standalone runtime for WebAssembly

A Bytecode Alliance project

build status zulip chat supported rustc stable Documentation Status

Guide | Contributing | Website | Chat

Installation

The Wasmtime CLI can be installed on Linux and macOS (locally) with a small install script:

curl https://wasmtime.dev/install.sh -sSf | bash

Windows or otherwise interested users can download installers and binaries directly from the GitHub Releases page.

Example

If you've got the Rust compiler installed then you can take some Rust source code:

fn main() {
    println!("Hello, world!");
}

and compile/run it with:

$ rustup target add wasm32-wasi
$ rustc hello.rs --target wasm32-wasi
$ wasmtime hello.wasm
Hello, world!

(Note: make sure you installed Rust using the rustup method in the official instructions above, and do not have a copy of the Rust toolchain installed on your system in some other way as well (e.g. the system package manager). Otherwise, the rustup target add... command may not install the target for the correct copy of Rust.)

Features

  • Fast. Wasmtime is built on the optimizing Cranelift code generator to quickly generate high-quality machine code either at runtime or ahead-of-time. Wasmtime is optimized for efficient instantiation, low-overhead calls between the embedder and wasm, and scalability of concurrent instances.

  • Secure. Wasmtime's development is strongly focused on correctness and security. Building on top of Rust's runtime safety guarantees, each Wasmtime feature goes through careful review and consideration via an RFC process. Once features are designed and implemented, they undergo 24/7 fuzzing donated by Google's OSS Fuzz. As features stabilize they become part of a release, and when things go wrong we have a well-defined security policy in place to quickly mitigate and patch any issues. We follow best practices for defense-in-depth and integrate protections and mitigations for issues like Spectre. Finally, we're working to push the state-of-the-art by collaborating with academic researchers to formally verify critical parts of Wasmtime and Cranelift.

  • Configurable. Wasmtime uses sensible defaults, but can also be configured to provide more fine-grained control over things like CPU and memory consumption. Whether you want to run Wasmtime in a tiny environment or on massive servers with many concurrent instances, we've got you covered.

  • WASI. Wasmtime supports a rich set of APIs for interacting with the host environment through the WASI standard.

  • Standards Compliant. Wasmtime passes the official WebAssembly test suite, implements the official C API of wasm, and implements future proposals to WebAssembly as well. Wasmtime developers are intimately engaged with the WebAssembly standards process all along the way too.

Language Support

You can use Wasmtime from a variety of different languages through embeddings of the implementation.

Languages supported by the Bytecode Alliance:

Languages supported by the community:

Documentation

📚 Read the Wasmtime guide here! 📚

The wasmtime guide is the best starting point to learn about what Wasmtime can do for you or help answer your questions about Wasmtime. If you're curious in contributing to Wasmtime, it can also help you do that!


It's Wasmtime.

Description
No description provided
Readme 125 MiB
Languages
Rust 77.8%
WebAssembly 20.6%
C 1.3%