The StructReturn ABI is fairly simple at the codegen/isel level: we only
need to take care to return the sret pointer as one of the return values
if that wasn't specified in the initial function signature.
Struct arguments are a little more complex. A struct argument is stored
as a chunk of memory in the stack-args space. However, the CLIF
semantics are slightly special: on the caller side, the parameter passed
in is a pointer to an arbitrary memory block, and we must memcpy this
data to the on-stack struct-argument; and on the callee side, we provide
a pointer to the passed-in struct-argument as the CLIF block param
value.
This is necessary to support various ABIs other than Wasm, such as that
of Rust (with the cg_clif codegen backend).
This follows the implementation in the legacy x86 backend, including
hardcoded sequence that is compatible with what the linker expects. We
could potentially do better here, but it is likely not necessary.
Thanks to @bjorn3 for a bugfix to an earlier version of this.
rather than the results telling you an individual file was a badf.
why? i think the old behavior was too clever, and makes it harder to
write a scheduler.
* what should the call do when you pass it some badf and some not-badf?
i don't think anything besides exiting early is the correct answer.
* the results vector tells you something that the scheduler had to say
about the file, not about your inputs. the errno of the function
always says what the validity of the inputs was
this is unfortunate but the poll_oneoff test insists on polling on stdio
handles. to undo this temporary fix later, lets rewrite the test to open
some regular files from the scratch directory and poll on them instead.
This implements all of the ops on I128 that are implemented by the
legacy x86 backend, and includes all that are required by at least one
major use-case (cg_clif rustc backend).
The sequences are open-coded where necessary; for e.g. the bit
operations, this can be somewhat complex, but these sequences have been
tested carefully. This PR also includes a drive-by fix of clz/ctz for 8-
and 16-bit cases where they were incorrect previously.
Also includes ridealong fixes developed while bringing up cg_clif
support, because they are difficult to completely separate due to
other refactors that occurred in this PR:
- fix REX prefix logic for some 8-bit instructions.
When using an 8-bit register in 64-bit mode on x86-64, the REX prefix
semantics are somewhat subtle: without the REX prefix, register numbers
4--7 correspond to the second-to-lowest byte of the first four registers
(AH, CH, BH, DH), whereas with the REX prefix, these register numbers
correspond to the usual encoding (SPL, BPL, SIL, DIL). We could always
emit a REX byte for instructions with 8-bit cases (this is harmless even
if unneeded), but this would unnecessarily inflate code size; instead,
the usual approach is to emit it only for these registers.
This logic was present in some cases but missing for some other
instructions: divide, not, negate, shifts.
Fixes#2508.
- avoid unaligned SSE loads on some f64 ops.
The implementations of several FP ops, such as fabs/fneg, used SSE
instructions. This is not a problem per-se, except that load-op merging
did not take *alignment* into account. Specifically, if an op on an f64
loaded from memory happened to merge that load, and the instruction into
which it was merged was an SSE instruction, then the SSE instruction
imposes stricter (128-bit) alignment requirements than the load.f64 did.
This PR simply forces any instruction lowerings that could use SSE
instructions to implement non-SIMD operations to take inputs in
registers only, and avoid load-op merging.
Fixes#2507.
- two bugfixes exposed by cg_clif: urem/srem.i8, select.b1.
- urem/srem.i8: the 8-bit form of the DIV instruction on x86-64 places
the remainder in AH, not RDX, different from all the other width-forms
of this instruction.
- select.b1: we were not recognizing selects of boolean values as
integer-typed operations, so we were generating XMM moves instead (!).
This commit updates the various tooling used by wasmtime which has new
updates to the module linking proposal. This is done primarily to sync
with WebAssembly/module-linking#26. The main change implemented here is
that wasmtime now supports creating instances from a set of values, nott
just from instantiating a module. Additionally subtyping handling of
modules with respect to imports is now properly handled by desugaring
two-level imports to imports of instances.
A number of small refactorings are included here as well, but most of
them are in accordance with the changes to `wasmparser` and the updated
binary format for module linking.
* Update WebAssembly C API submodule to latest commit.
This commit updates the WebAssembly C API submodule (for `wasm.h`) to the
latest commit out of master.
This fixes the behavior of `wasm_name_new_from_string` such that it no longer
copies the null character into the name, which caused unexpected failures when
using the Wasmtime linker as imports wouldn't resolve when the null was
present.
Along with this change were breaking changes to `wasm_func_call`, the host
callback signatures, and `wasm_instance_new` to take a vector type instead of a
pointer to an unsized array.
As a result, Wasmtime language bindings based on the C API will need to be
updated once this change is pulled in.
Fixes#2211.
Fixes#2131.
* Update Doxygen comments for wasm.h changes.
Re-enables spec tests that were turned off for #2432 and #2470 while
also enabling tests that now work due to patch pushes in the interim.
Currently all SIMD spec tests past. Testing to assure this is ok to
enable hasn't been super intense so we should monitor but there
was an attempt of doing 1000 runs 3 different times to try and reproduce
the issue and it did not occur. In the past would have occurred several
times with that many runs.
An intermittent failure during SIMD spectests is described in #2432. This patch
corrects code written in a way that assumes comparing fp equality of a register with itself will
always return true. This is not true when the register value is NaN as NaN. In this case, and
with all ordered comparisons involving NaN, the comparisons will always return false.
This patch corrects that assumption for SIMD Fabs and Fneg which seem to be the only
instructions generating the failure with #2432.
On x64, the new backend generates `cmp` instructions at their use-sites
when possible (when the icmp that generates a boolean is known) so that
the condition flows directly through flags rather than a materialized
boolean. E.g., both `bint` (boolean to int) and `select` (conditional
select) instruction lowerings invoke `emit_cmp()` to do so.
Load-op fusion in `emit_cmp()` nominally allowed `cmp` to use its `cmp
reg, mem` form.
However, the mergeable-load condition (load has only single use) was not
adequately checked. Consider the sequence:
```
v2 = load.i64 v1
v3 = icmp eq v0, v2
v4 = bint.i64 v3
v5 = select.i64 v3, v0, v1
```
The load `v2` is only used in the `icmp` at `v3`. However, the cmp will
be separately codegen'd twice, once for the `bint` and once for the
`select`.
Prior to this fix, the above example would result in the load at `v2`
sinking to the `cmp` just above the `select`; we then emit another `cmp`
for the `bint`, but the load has already been used once so we do not
allow merging. We thus (i) expect the register for `v2` to contain the
loaded value, but (ii) skip the codegen for the load because it has been
sunk. This results in a regalloc error (unexpected livein) as the
unfilled register is upward-exposed to the entry point.
Because of this, we need to accept only the reg, reg form in
`emit_cmp()` (and the FP equivalent). We could get marginally better
code by tracking whether the `cmp` we are emitting comes from an
`icmp`/`fcmp` with only one use; but IMHO simplicity is a better rule
here when subtle interactions occur.
This helps us avoid measurement bias due to accidental locality of unrelated
heap objects. See *Stabilizer: Statistically Sound Performance Evaluation* by
Curtsinger and Berger for details (although Stabilizer deals with much more than
just the location of heap allocations):
https://people.cs.umass.edu/~emery/pubs/stabilizer-asplos13.pdf
