With the old backends, this would log the lowered+legalized clif, but the log is
useles now with the new backends. Logging the disasm is the new moral
equivalent.
* Automate more of Wasmtime's release process
This change revamps the release process for Wasmtime and intends to make
it nearly 100% automated for major release and hopefully still pretty
simple for patch releases. New workflows are introduced as part of
this commit:
* Once a month a PR is created with major version bumps
* Specifically hinted commit messages to the `main` branch will get
tagged and pushed to the main repository.
* On tags we'll now not only build releases after running CI but
additionally crates will be published to crates.io.
In conjunction with other changes this means that the release process
for a new major version of Wasmtime is simply merging a PR. Patch
releases will involve running some steps locally but most of the
nitty-gritty should be simply merging the PR that's generated.
* Use an anchor in a regex
* Adjust dependency directives between crates
This commit is a preparation for the release process for Wasmtime. The
specific changes here are to delineate which crates are "public", and
all version requirements on non-public crates will now be done with
`=A.B.C` version requirements instead of today's `A.B.C` version
requirements.
The purpose for doing this is to assist with patch releases that might
happen in the future. Patch releases of wasmtime are already required to
not break the APIs of "public" crates, but no such guarantee is given
about "internal" crates. This means that a patch release runs the risk,
for example, of breaking an internal API. In doing so though we would
also need to release a new major version of the internal crate, but we
wouldn't have a great hole in the number scheme of major versions to do
so. By using `=A.B.C` requirements for internal crates it means we can
safely ignore strict semver-compatibility between releases of internal
crates for patch releases, since the only consumers of the crate will be
the corresponding patch release of the `wasmtime` crate itself (or other
public crates).
The `publish.rs` script has been updated with a check to verify that
dependencies on internal crates are all specified with an `=`
dependency, and dependnecies on all public crates are without a `=`
dependency. This will hopefully make it so we don't have to worry about
what to use where, we just let CI tell us what to do. Using this
modification all version dependency declarations have been updated.
Note that some crates were adjusted to simply remove their `version`
requirement in cases such as the crate wasn't published anyway (`publish
= false` was specified) or it's in the `dev-dependencies` section which
doesn't need version specifiers for path dependencies.
* Switch to normal sever deps for cranelift dependencies
These crates will now all be considered "public" where in patch releases
they will be guaranteed to not have breaking changes.
This eagerly evaluates the `format!` and produces a `String` with a heap
allocation, regardless whether `foo` is `Some`/`Ok` or `None`/`Err`. Using
`foo.unwrap_or_else(|| panic!(...))` makes it so that the error message
formatting is only evaluated if `foo` is `None`/`Err`.
Fixes#3468.
If a program has many instances of the pattern "goto next; next:" in a
row (i.e., no-op branches to the fallthrough address), the branch
simplification in `MachBuffer` would remove them all, as expected.
However, in order to work correctly, the algorithm needs to track all
labels that alias the current buffer tail, so that they can be adjusted
later if another branch chomp occurs.
When many thousands of this branch-to-next pattern occur, many thousands
of labels will reference the current buffer tail, and this list of
thousands of labels will be shuffled between the branch metadata struct
and the "labels at tail" struct as branches are appended and then
chomped immediately.
It's possible that with smarter data structure design, we could somehow
share the list of labels -- e.g., a single array of all labels, in order
they are bound, with ranges of indices in this array used to represent
lists of labels (actually, that seems like a better design in general);
but let's leave that to future optimization work.
For now, we can avoid the quadratic behavior by just "giving up" if the
list is too long; it's always valid to not optimize a branch. It is very
unlikely that the "normal" case will have more than 100 "goto next"
branches in a row, so this should not have any perf impact; if it does,
we will leave 1 out of every 100 such branches un-optimized in a long
sequence of thousands.
This takes total compilation time down on my machine from ~300ms to
~72ms for the `foo.wasm` case in #3441. For reference, the old backend
(now removed), built from arbitrarily-chosen-1-year-old commit
`c7fcc344`, takes 158ms, so we're ~twice as fast, which is what I would
expect.
It appears that some allocation heuristics have changed slightly since
0.0.31, so some of the golden-output filetests are updated as well.
Ideally we would rely more on runtests rather than golden-compilation
tests; but for now this is sufficient. (I'm not sure exactly what in
regalloc.rs changed to alter these heuristics; it's actually been almost
a year since the 0.0.31 release with several refactorings and tweaks
merged since then.)
Fixes#3441.
When there is a linking error caused by an undefined instance, list all
the instances exports in the error message. This will clarify errors for
undefined two-level imports that get desugared to one-level instance
imports under the module-linking proposal.
