Drop the domtree argument to legalize_function().

Future legalization patterns will have the ability to mutate the
flowgraph, so the domtree's list of RPO blocks is not a good guide for
iteration. Use the layout order instead. This will pick up any new EBBs
inserted.
This commit is contained in:
Jakob Stoklund Olesen
2017-08-25 10:36:25 -07:00
parent aae946128b
commit fecbcbb7b4
2 changed files with 5 additions and 11 deletions

View File

@@ -103,7 +103,7 @@ impl Context {
/// Run the legalizer for `isa` on the function.
pub fn legalize(&mut self, isa: &TargetIsa) -> CtonResult {
legalize_function(&mut self.func, &mut self.cfg, &self.domtree, isa);
legalize_function(&mut self.func, &mut self.cfg, isa);
self.verify_if(isa)
}

View File

@@ -14,7 +14,6 @@
//! from the encoding recipes, and solved later by the register allocator.
use cursor::{Cursor, FuncCursor};
use dominator_tree::DominatorTree;
use flowgraph::ControlFlowGraph;
use ir;
use isa::TargetIsa;
@@ -33,21 +32,16 @@ use self::heap::expand_heap_addr;
/// - Transform any instructions that don't have a legal representation in `isa`.
/// - Fill out `func.encodings`.
///
pub fn legalize_function(func: &mut ir::Function,
cfg: &mut ControlFlowGraph,
domtree: &DominatorTree,
isa: &TargetIsa) {
pub fn legalize_function(func: &mut ir::Function, cfg: &mut ControlFlowGraph, isa: &TargetIsa) {
boundary::legalize_signatures(func, isa);
func.encodings.resize(func.dfg.num_insts());
let mut pos = FuncCursor::new(func);
// Process EBBs in a reverse post-order. This minimizes the number of split instructions we
// need.
for &ebb in domtree.cfg_postorder().iter().rev() {
pos.goto_top(ebb);
// Process EBBs in layout order. Some legalization actions may split the current EBB or append
// new ones to the end. We need to make sure we visit those new EBBs too.
while let Some(_ebb) = pos.next_ebb() {
// Keep track of the cursor position before the instruction being processed, so we can
// double back when replacing instructions.
let mut prev_pos = pos.position();