Rework inner allocation-loop code: choose more wisely between splitting and evicting based on costs (and unify the fixed-reg-constraint case)
This commit is contained in:
454
src/ion/mod.rs
454
src/ion/mod.rs
@@ -691,6 +691,8 @@ struct RegTraversalIter<'a> {
|
||||
non_pref_idx: usize,
|
||||
offset_pref: usize,
|
||||
offset_non_pref: usize,
|
||||
is_fixed: bool,
|
||||
fixed: Option<PReg>,
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
impl<'a> RegTraversalIter<'a> {
|
||||
@@ -700,6 +702,7 @@ impl<'a> RegTraversalIter<'a> {
|
||||
hint_reg: PReg,
|
||||
hint2_reg: PReg,
|
||||
offset: usize,
|
||||
fixed: Option<PReg>,
|
||||
) -> Self {
|
||||
let mut hint_reg = if hint_reg != PReg::invalid() {
|
||||
Some(hint_reg)
|
||||
@@ -737,6 +740,8 @@ impl<'a> RegTraversalIter<'a> {
|
||||
non_pref_idx: 0,
|
||||
offset_pref,
|
||||
offset_non_pref,
|
||||
is_fixed: fixed.is_some(),
|
||||
fixed,
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
@@ -745,6 +750,12 @@ impl<'a> std::iter::Iterator for RegTraversalIter<'a> {
|
||||
type Item = PReg;
|
||||
|
||||
fn next(&mut self) -> Option<PReg> {
|
||||
if self.is_fixed {
|
||||
let ret = self.fixed;
|
||||
self.fixed = None;
|
||||
return ret;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
fn wrap(idx: usize, limit: usize) -> usize {
|
||||
if idx >= limit {
|
||||
idx - limit
|
||||
@@ -2939,138 +2950,27 @@ impl<'a, F: Function> Env<'a, F> {
|
||||
};
|
||||
log::debug!("process_bundle: bundle {:?} hint {:?}", bundle, hint_reg,);
|
||||
|
||||
if let Requirement::Conflict = req {
|
||||
// We have to split right away.
|
||||
let bundle_start = self.bundles[bundle.index()].ranges[0].range.from;
|
||||
self.split_and_requeue_bundle(
|
||||
bundle,
|
||||
/* split_at_point = */ bundle_start,
|
||||
reg_hint,
|
||||
);
|
||||
return Ok(());
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Try to allocate!
|
||||
let mut attempts = 0;
|
||||
let mut split_at_point = self.bundles[bundle.index()].ranges[0].range.from;
|
||||
let mut requeue_with_reg = PReg::invalid();
|
||||
loop {
|
||||
attempts += 1;
|
||||
log::debug!("attempt {}, req {:?}", attempts, req);
|
||||
debug_assert!(attempts < 100 * self.func.insts());
|
||||
|
||||
let (conflicting_bundles, first_conflict_point, first_conflict_reg) = match req {
|
||||
Requirement::Fixed(preg) => {
|
||||
let preg_idx = PRegIndex::new(preg.index());
|
||||
self.stats.process_bundle_reg_probes_fixed += 1;
|
||||
log::debug!("trying fixed reg {:?}", preg_idx);
|
||||
match self.try_to_allocate_bundle_to_reg(bundle, preg_idx, None) {
|
||||
AllocRegResult::Allocated(alloc) => {
|
||||
self.stats.process_bundle_reg_success_fixed += 1;
|
||||
log::debug!(" -> allocated to fixed {:?}", preg_idx);
|
||||
self.spillsets[self.bundles[bundle.index()].spillset.index()]
|
||||
.reg_hint = alloc.as_reg().unwrap();
|
||||
return Ok(());
|
||||
}
|
||||
AllocRegResult::Conflict(bundles) => {
|
||||
log::debug!(" -> conflict with bundles {:?}", bundles);
|
||||
let first_bundle = bundles[0];
|
||||
(
|
||||
bundles,
|
||||
self.bundles[first_bundle.index()].ranges[0].range.from,
|
||||
preg,
|
||||
)
|
||||
}
|
||||
AllocRegResult::ConflictWithFixed(_, point) => {
|
||||
log::debug!(" -> conflict with fixed alloc");
|
||||
(smallvec![], point, preg)
|
||||
}
|
||||
AllocRegResult::ConflictHighCost => unreachable!(),
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
Requirement::Register(class) => {
|
||||
// Scan all pregs and attempt to allocate.
|
||||
let mut lowest_cost_conflict_set: Option<LiveBundleVec> = None;
|
||||
let mut lowest_cost_conflict_cost: Option<u32> = None;
|
||||
let mut lowest_cost_conflict_point = ProgPoint::before(Inst::new(0));
|
||||
let mut lowest_cost_conflict_reg = PReg::invalid();
|
||||
|
||||
// Heuristic: start the scan for an available
|
||||
// register at an offset influenced both by our
|
||||
// location in the code and by the bundle we're
|
||||
// considering. This has the effect of spreading
|
||||
// demand more evenly across registers.
|
||||
let scan_offset = self.ranges
|
||||
[self.bundles[bundle.index()].ranges[0].index.index()]
|
||||
.range
|
||||
.from
|
||||
.inst()
|
||||
.index()
|
||||
+ bundle.index();
|
||||
|
||||
self.stats.process_bundle_reg_probe_start_any += 1;
|
||||
for preg in RegTraversalIter::new(
|
||||
self.env,
|
||||
class,
|
||||
hint_reg,
|
||||
PReg::invalid(),
|
||||
scan_offset,
|
||||
) {
|
||||
self.stats.process_bundle_reg_probes_any += 1;
|
||||
let preg_idx = PRegIndex::new(preg.index());
|
||||
log::debug!("trying preg {:?}", preg_idx);
|
||||
|
||||
match self.try_to_allocate_bundle_to_reg(
|
||||
bundle,
|
||||
preg_idx,
|
||||
lowest_cost_conflict_cost,
|
||||
) {
|
||||
AllocRegResult::Allocated(alloc) => {
|
||||
self.stats.process_bundle_reg_success_any += 1;
|
||||
log::debug!(" -> allocated to any {:?}", preg_idx);
|
||||
self.spillsets[self.bundles[bundle.index()].spillset.index()]
|
||||
.reg_hint = alloc.as_reg().unwrap();
|
||||
return Ok(());
|
||||
}
|
||||
AllocRegResult::Conflict(bundles) => {
|
||||
log::debug!(" -> conflict with bundles {:?}", bundles);
|
||||
|
||||
let first_conflict_point =
|
||||
self.bundles[bundles[0].index()].ranges[0].range.from;
|
||||
|
||||
let cost = self.maximum_spill_weight_in_bundle_set(&bundles);
|
||||
|
||||
if lowest_cost_conflict_cost.is_none()
|
||||
|| cost < lowest_cost_conflict_cost.unwrap()
|
||||
{
|
||||
lowest_cost_conflict_cost = Some(cost);
|
||||
lowest_cost_conflict_set = Some(bundles);
|
||||
lowest_cost_conflict_point = first_conflict_point;
|
||||
lowest_cost_conflict_reg = preg;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
AllocRegResult::ConflictWithFixed(max_cost, point) => {
|
||||
log::debug!(" -> conflict with fixed alloc; cost of other bundles up to point is {}, conflict at {:?}", max_cost, point);
|
||||
if lowest_cost_conflict_cost.is_none()
|
||||
|| max_cost < lowest_cost_conflict_cost.unwrap()
|
||||
{
|
||||
lowest_cost_conflict_cost = Some(max_cost);
|
||||
lowest_cost_conflict_set = Some(smallvec![]);
|
||||
lowest_cost_conflict_point = point;
|
||||
lowest_cost_conflict_reg = preg;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
AllocRegResult::ConflictHighCost => {
|
||||
// Simply don't consider -- we already have
|
||||
// a lower-cost conflict bundle option
|
||||
// to evict.
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Otherwise, we *require* a register, but didn't fit into
|
||||
// any with current bundle assignments. Hence, we will need
|
||||
// to either split or attempt to evict some bundles. Return
|
||||
// the conflicting bundles to evict and retry. Empty list
|
||||
// means nothing to try (due to fixed conflict) so we must
|
||||
// split instead.
|
||||
(
|
||||
lowest_cost_conflict_set.unwrap_or(smallvec![]),
|
||||
lowest_cost_conflict_point,
|
||||
lowest_cost_conflict_reg,
|
||||
)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
let (class, fixed_preg) = match req {
|
||||
Requirement::Fixed(preg) => (preg.class(), Some(preg)),
|
||||
Requirement::Register(class) => (class, None),
|
||||
Requirement::Stack(_) => {
|
||||
// If we must be on the stack, mark our spillset
|
||||
// as required immediately.
|
||||
@@ -3086,114 +2986,233 @@ impl<'a, F: Function> Env<'a, F> {
|
||||
return Ok(());
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
Requirement::Conflict => {
|
||||
break;
|
||||
}
|
||||
Requirement::Conflict => unreachable!(),
|
||||
};
|
||||
// Scan all pregs, or the one fixed preg, and attempt to allocate.
|
||||
|
||||
log::debug!(" -> conflict set {:?}", conflicting_bundles);
|
||||
log::debug!(
|
||||
" -> first conflict {:?} with reg {:?}",
|
||||
first_conflict_point,
|
||||
first_conflict_reg
|
||||
);
|
||||
let mut lowest_cost_evict_conflict_set: Option<LiveBundleVec> = None;
|
||||
let mut lowest_cost_evict_conflict_cost: Option<u32> = None;
|
||||
|
||||
// If we have already tried evictions once before and are
|
||||
// still unsuccessful, give up and move on to splitting as
|
||||
// long as this is not a minimal bundle.
|
||||
if attempts >= 2 && !self.minimal_bundle(bundle) {
|
||||
break;
|
||||
}
|
||||
let mut lowest_cost_split_conflict_cost: Option<u32> = None;
|
||||
let mut lowest_cost_split_conflict_point = ProgPoint::before(Inst::new(0));
|
||||
let mut lowest_cost_split_conflict_reg = PReg::invalid();
|
||||
|
||||
let bundle_start = self.bundles[bundle.index()].ranges[0].range.from;
|
||||
split_at_point = std::cmp::max(first_conflict_point, bundle_start);
|
||||
requeue_with_reg = first_conflict_reg;
|
||||
// Heuristic: start the scan for an available
|
||||
// register at an offset influenced both by our
|
||||
// location in the code and by the bundle we're
|
||||
// considering. This has the effect of spreading
|
||||
// demand more evenly across registers.
|
||||
let scan_offset = self.ranges[self.bundles[bundle.index()].ranges[0].index.index()]
|
||||
.range
|
||||
.from
|
||||
.inst()
|
||||
.index()
|
||||
+ bundle.index();
|
||||
|
||||
// Adjust `split_at_point` if it is within a deeper loop
|
||||
// than the bundle start -- hoist it to just before the
|
||||
// first loop header it encounters.
|
||||
let bundle_start_depth = self.cfginfo.approx_loop_depth
|
||||
[self.cfginfo.insn_block[bundle_start.inst().index()].index()];
|
||||
let split_at_depth = self.cfginfo.approx_loop_depth
|
||||
[self.cfginfo.insn_block[split_at_point.inst().index()].index()];
|
||||
if split_at_depth > bundle_start_depth {
|
||||
for block in (self.cfginfo.insn_block[bundle_start.inst().index()].index() + 1)
|
||||
..=self.cfginfo.insn_block[split_at_point.inst().index()].index()
|
||||
{
|
||||
if self.cfginfo.approx_loop_depth[block] > bundle_start_depth {
|
||||
split_at_point = self.cfginfo.block_entry[block];
|
||||
break;
|
||||
self.stats.process_bundle_reg_probe_start_any += 1;
|
||||
for preg in RegTraversalIter::new(
|
||||
self.env,
|
||||
class,
|
||||
hint_reg,
|
||||
PReg::invalid(),
|
||||
scan_offset,
|
||||
fixed_preg,
|
||||
) {
|
||||
self.stats.process_bundle_reg_probes_any += 1;
|
||||
let preg_idx = PRegIndex::new(preg.index());
|
||||
log::debug!("trying preg {:?}", preg_idx);
|
||||
|
||||
let scan_limit_cost = match (
|
||||
lowest_cost_evict_conflict_cost,
|
||||
lowest_cost_split_conflict_cost,
|
||||
) {
|
||||
(Some(a), Some(b)) => Some(std::cmp::max(a, b)),
|
||||
_ => None,
|
||||
};
|
||||
match self.try_to_allocate_bundle_to_reg(bundle, preg_idx, scan_limit_cost) {
|
||||
AllocRegResult::Allocated(alloc) => {
|
||||
self.stats.process_bundle_reg_success_any += 1;
|
||||
log::debug!(" -> allocated to any {:?}", preg_idx);
|
||||
self.spillsets[self.bundles[bundle.index()].spillset.index()].reg_hint =
|
||||
alloc.as_reg().unwrap();
|
||||
return Ok(());
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
AllocRegResult::Conflict(bundles) => {
|
||||
log::debug!(" -> conflict with bundles {:?}", bundles);
|
||||
|
||||
// If we hit a fixed conflict, give up and move on to splitting.
|
||||
if conflicting_bundles.is_empty() {
|
||||
break;
|
||||
}
|
||||
let first_conflict_point =
|
||||
self.bundles[bundles[0].index()].ranges[0].range.from;
|
||||
|
||||
// If the maximum spill weight in the conflicting-bundles set is >= this bundle's spill
|
||||
// weight, then don't evict.
|
||||
let max_spill_weight = self.maximum_spill_weight_in_bundle_set(&conflicting_bundles);
|
||||
log::debug!(
|
||||
" -> max_spill_weight = {}; our spill weight {}",
|
||||
max_spill_weight,
|
||||
self.bundle_spill_weight(bundle)
|
||||
);
|
||||
if max_spill_weight >= self.bundle_spill_weight(bundle) {
|
||||
log::debug!(" -> we're already the cheapest bundle to spill -- going to split");
|
||||
break;
|
||||
}
|
||||
let conflict_cost = self.maximum_spill_weight_in_bundle_set(&bundles);
|
||||
|
||||
// Evict all bundles in `conflicting bundles` and try again.
|
||||
self.stats.evict_bundle_event += 1;
|
||||
for &bundle in &conflicting_bundles {
|
||||
log::debug!(" -> evicting {:?}", bundle);
|
||||
self.evict_bundle(bundle);
|
||||
self.stats.evict_bundle_count += 1;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
if lowest_cost_evict_conflict_cost.is_none()
|
||||
|| conflict_cost < lowest_cost_evict_conflict_cost.unwrap()
|
||||
{
|
||||
lowest_cost_evict_conflict_cost = Some(conflict_cost);
|
||||
lowest_cost_evict_conflict_set = Some(bundles);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// A minimal bundle cannot be split.
|
||||
if self.minimal_bundle(bundle) {
|
||||
if let Requirement::Register(class) = req {
|
||||
// Check if this is a too-many-live-registers situation.
|
||||
let range = self.bundles[bundle.index()].ranges[0].range;
|
||||
let mut min_bundles_assigned = 0;
|
||||
let mut fixed_assigned = 0;
|
||||
let mut total_regs = 0;
|
||||
for preg in self.env.preferred_regs_by_class[class as u8 as usize]
|
||||
.iter()
|
||||
.chain(self.env.non_preferred_regs_by_class[class as u8 as usize].iter())
|
||||
{
|
||||
if let Some(&lr) = self.pregs[preg.index()]
|
||||
.allocations
|
||||
.btree
|
||||
.get(&LiveRangeKey::from_range(&range))
|
||||
{
|
||||
if lr.is_valid() {
|
||||
if self.minimal_bundle(self.ranges[lr.index()].bundle) {
|
||||
min_bundles_assigned += 1;
|
||||
}
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
fixed_assigned += 1;
|
||||
let loop_depth = self.cfginfo.approx_loop_depth
|
||||
[self.cfginfo.insn_block[first_conflict_point.inst().index()].index()];
|
||||
let move_cost = spill_weight_from_policy(
|
||||
OperandPolicy::Reg,
|
||||
loop_depth as usize,
|
||||
/* is_def = */ true,
|
||||
);
|
||||
if lowest_cost_split_conflict_cost.is_none()
|
||||
|| (conflict_cost + move_cost)
|
||||
< lowest_cost_split_conflict_cost.unwrap()
|
||||
{
|
||||
lowest_cost_split_conflict_cost = Some(conflict_cost + move_cost);
|
||||
lowest_cost_split_conflict_point = first_conflict_point;
|
||||
lowest_cost_split_conflict_reg = preg;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
total_regs += 1;
|
||||
AllocRegResult::ConflictWithFixed(max_cost, point) => {
|
||||
log::debug!(" -> conflict with fixed alloc; cost of other bundles up to point is {}, conflict at {:?}", max_cost, point);
|
||||
|
||||
let loop_depth = self.cfginfo.approx_loop_depth
|
||||
[self.cfginfo.insn_block[point.inst().index()].index()];
|
||||
let move_cost = spill_weight_from_policy(
|
||||
OperandPolicy::Reg,
|
||||
loop_depth as usize,
|
||||
/* is_def = */ true,
|
||||
);
|
||||
|
||||
if lowest_cost_split_conflict_cost.is_none()
|
||||
|| (max_cost + move_cost) < lowest_cost_split_conflict_cost.unwrap()
|
||||
{
|
||||
lowest_cost_split_conflict_cost = Some(max_cost + move_cost);
|
||||
lowest_cost_split_conflict_point = point;
|
||||
lowest_cost_split_conflict_reg = preg;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
AllocRegResult::ConflictHighCost => {
|
||||
// Simply don't consider -- we already have
|
||||
// a lower-cost conflict bundle option
|
||||
// to evict.
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
if min_bundles_assigned + fixed_assigned == total_regs {
|
||||
return Err(RegAllocError::TooManyLiveRegs);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Otherwise, we *require* a register, but didn't fit into
|
||||
// any with current bundle assignments. Hence, we will need
|
||||
// to either split or attempt to evict some bundles.
|
||||
|
||||
log::debug!(
|
||||
" -> lowest cost evict: set {:?}, cost {:?}",
|
||||
lowest_cost_evict_conflict_set,
|
||||
lowest_cost_evict_conflict_cost,
|
||||
);
|
||||
log::debug!(
|
||||
" -> lowest cost split: cost {:?}, point {:?}, reg {:?}",
|
||||
lowest_cost_split_conflict_cost,
|
||||
lowest_cost_split_conflict_point,
|
||||
lowest_cost_split_conflict_reg
|
||||
);
|
||||
|
||||
// If we reach here, we *must* have an option either to split or evict.
|
||||
assert!(
|
||||
lowest_cost_split_conflict_cost.is_some()
|
||||
|| lowest_cost_evict_conflict_cost.is_some()
|
||||
);
|
||||
|
||||
// If our bundle's weight is less than or equal to(*) the
|
||||
// evict cost, choose to split. Also pick splitting if
|
||||
// we're on our second or more attempt as long as the
|
||||
// bundle isn't minimal. Also pick splitting if the
|
||||
// conflict set is empty, meaning a fixed conflict that
|
||||
// can't be evicted.
|
||||
//
|
||||
// (*) the "equal to" part is very important: it prevents
|
||||
// an infinite loop where two bundles with equal spill
|
||||
// cost continually evict each other in an infinite
|
||||
// allocation loop. In such a case, the first bundle in
|
||||
// wins, and the other splits.
|
||||
if (attempts >= 2 && !self.minimal_bundle(bundle))
|
||||
|| lowest_cost_evict_conflict_cost.is_none()
|
||||
|| self.bundle_spill_weight(bundle) <= lowest_cost_evict_conflict_cost.unwrap()
|
||||
{
|
||||
log::debug!(
|
||||
" -> deciding to split: our spill weight is {}",
|
||||
self.bundle_spill_weight(bundle)
|
||||
);
|
||||
let bundle_start = self.bundles[bundle.index()].ranges[0].range.from;
|
||||
let mut split_at_point =
|
||||
std::cmp::max(lowest_cost_split_conflict_point, bundle_start);
|
||||
let requeue_with_reg = lowest_cost_split_conflict_reg;
|
||||
|
||||
// Adjust `split_at_point` if it is within a deeper loop
|
||||
// than the bundle start -- hoist it to just before the
|
||||
// first loop header it encounters.
|
||||
let bundle_start_depth = self.cfginfo.approx_loop_depth
|
||||
[self.cfginfo.insn_block[bundle_start.inst().index()].index()];
|
||||
let split_at_depth = self.cfginfo.approx_loop_depth
|
||||
[self.cfginfo.insn_block[split_at_point.inst().index()].index()];
|
||||
if split_at_depth > bundle_start_depth {
|
||||
for block in (self.cfginfo.insn_block[bundle_start.inst().index()].index() + 1)
|
||||
..=self.cfginfo.insn_block[split_at_point.inst().index()].index()
|
||||
{
|
||||
if self.cfginfo.approx_loop_depth[block] > bundle_start_depth {
|
||||
split_at_point = self.cfginfo.block_entry[block];
|
||||
break;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// A minimal bundle cannot be split.
|
||||
if self.minimal_bundle(bundle) {
|
||||
if let Requirement::Register(class) = req {
|
||||
// Check if this is a too-many-live-registers situation.
|
||||
let range = self.bundles[bundle.index()].ranges[0].range;
|
||||
let mut min_bundles_assigned = 0;
|
||||
let mut fixed_assigned = 0;
|
||||
let mut total_regs = 0;
|
||||
for preg in self.env.preferred_regs_by_class[class as u8 as usize]
|
||||
.iter()
|
||||
.chain(
|
||||
self.env.non_preferred_regs_by_class[class as u8 as usize].iter(),
|
||||
)
|
||||
{
|
||||
if let Some(&lr) = self.pregs[preg.index()]
|
||||
.allocations
|
||||
.btree
|
||||
.get(&LiveRangeKey::from_range(&range))
|
||||
{
|
||||
if lr.is_valid() {
|
||||
if self.minimal_bundle(self.ranges[lr.index()].bundle) {
|
||||
min_bundles_assigned += 1;
|
||||
}
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
fixed_assigned += 1;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
total_regs += 1;
|
||||
}
|
||||
if min_bundles_assigned + fixed_assigned == total_regs {
|
||||
return Err(RegAllocError::TooManyLiveRegs);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
if self.minimal_bundle(bundle) {
|
||||
self.dump_state();
|
||||
}
|
||||
assert!(!self.minimal_bundle(bundle));
|
||||
|
||||
self.split_and_requeue_bundle(bundle, split_at_point, requeue_with_reg);
|
||||
|
||||
return Ok(());
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
// Evict all bundles in `conflicting bundles` and try again.
|
||||
self.stats.evict_bundle_event += 1;
|
||||
for &bundle in &lowest_cost_evict_conflict_set.unwrap() {
|
||||
log::debug!(" -> evicting {:?}", bundle);
|
||||
self.evict_bundle(bundle);
|
||||
self.stats.evict_bundle_count += 1;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
if self.minimal_bundle(bundle) {
|
||||
self.dump_state();
|
||||
}
|
||||
assert!(!self.minimal_bundle(bundle));
|
||||
|
||||
self.split_and_requeue_bundle(bundle, split_at_point, requeue_with_reg);
|
||||
|
||||
Ok(())
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
fn try_allocating_regs_for_spilled_bundles(&mut self) {
|
||||
@@ -3217,6 +3236,7 @@ impl<'a, F: Function> Env<'a, F> {
|
||||
PReg::invalid(),
|
||||
PReg::invalid(),
|
||||
bundle.index(),
|
||||
None,
|
||||
) {
|
||||
log::debug!("trying bundle {:?} to preg {:?}", bundle, preg);
|
||||
let preg_idx = PRegIndex::new(preg.index());
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user