Fuzzbug fix: properly check for conflicting reqs before merging bundles (cached values are not computed yet)
This commit is contained in:
133
src/ion/mod.rs
133
src/ion/mod.rs
@@ -2063,25 +2063,13 @@ impl<'a, F: Function> Env<'a, F> {
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// There could be a requirements conflict only one of the both
|
||||
// sides of the merge has at least one requirement that is not
|
||||
// 'Reg' or 'Any'. (Note that we already checked that the
|
||||
// RegClass is the same on both sides.)
|
||||
if self.bundles[from.index()].cached_fixed()
|
||||
|| self.bundles[from.index()].cached_stack()
|
||||
|| self.bundles[to.index()].cached_fixed()
|
||||
|| self.bundles[to.index()].cached_stack()
|
||||
{
|
||||
let mut req = Requirement::Unknown;
|
||||
for entry in ranges_from.iter().chain(ranges_to.iter()) {
|
||||
for u in &self.ranges[entry.index.index()].uses {
|
||||
req = req.merge(Requirement::from_operand(u.operand));
|
||||
if req == Requirement::Conflict {
|
||||
log::debug!(" -> conflicting requirements; aborting merge");
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
// Check for a requirements conflict.
|
||||
let req = self
|
||||
.compute_requirement(from)
|
||||
.merge(self.compute_requirement(to));
|
||||
if req == Requirement::Conflict {
|
||||
log::debug!(" -> conflicting requirements; aborting merge");
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
log::debug!(" -> committing to merge");
|
||||
@@ -2646,6 +2634,7 @@ impl<'a, F: Function> Env<'a, F> {
|
||||
fixed = true;
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
for u in &first_range_data.uses {
|
||||
log::debug!(" -> use: {:?}", u);
|
||||
if let OperandPolicy::FixedReg(_) = u.operand.policy() {
|
||||
log::debug!(" -> fixed use at {:?}: {:?}", u.pos, u.operand);
|
||||
fixed = true;
|
||||
@@ -2927,12 +2916,17 @@ impl<'a, F: Function> Env<'a, F> {
|
||||
|
||||
fn compute_requirement(&self, bundle: LiveBundleIndex) -> Requirement {
|
||||
let mut req = Requirement::Unknown;
|
||||
log::debug!("compute_requirement: {:?}", bundle);
|
||||
for entry in &self.bundles[bundle.index()].ranges {
|
||||
log::debug!(" -> LR {:?}", entry.index);
|
||||
for u in &self.ranges[entry.index.index()].uses {
|
||||
log::debug!(" -> use {:?}", u);
|
||||
let r = Requirement::from_operand(u.operand);
|
||||
req = req.merge(r);
|
||||
log::debug!(" -> req {:?}", req);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
log::debug!(" -> final: {:?}", req);
|
||||
req
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -2952,6 +2946,10 @@ impl<'a, F: Function> Env<'a, F> {
|
||||
|
||||
if let Requirement::Conflict = req {
|
||||
// We have to split right away.
|
||||
assert!(
|
||||
!self.minimal_bundle(bundle),
|
||||
"Minimal bundle with conflict!"
|
||||
);
|
||||
let bundle_start = self.bundles[bundle.index()].ranges[0].range.from;
|
||||
self.split_and_requeue_bundle(
|
||||
bundle,
|
||||
@@ -3118,21 +3116,64 @@ impl<'a, F: Function> Env<'a, F> {
|
||||
|| lowest_cost_evict_conflict_cost.is_some()
|
||||
);
|
||||
|
||||
// Check that we haven't attempted more than once with a
|
||||
// minimal bundle -- this would indicate a bug. We detect
|
||||
// the "too-many-live-registers" case here and return an
|
||||
// error cleanly, rather than panicking, because the
|
||||
// regalloc.rs fuzzer depends on the register allocator to
|
||||
// correctly reject impossible-to-allocate programs in
|
||||
// order to discard invalid test cases.
|
||||
if attempts >= 2 && self.minimal_bundle(bundle) {
|
||||
if let Requirement::Register(class) = req {
|
||||
// Check if this is a too-many-live-registers situation.
|
||||
let range = self.bundles[bundle.index()].ranges[0].range;
|
||||
let mut min_bundles_assigned = 0;
|
||||
let mut fixed_assigned = 0;
|
||||
let mut total_regs = 0;
|
||||
for preg in self.env.preferred_regs_by_class[class as u8 as usize]
|
||||
.iter()
|
||||
.chain(self.env.non_preferred_regs_by_class[class as u8 as usize].iter())
|
||||
{
|
||||
if let Some(&lr) = self.pregs[preg.index()]
|
||||
.allocations
|
||||
.btree
|
||||
.get(&LiveRangeKey::from_range(&range))
|
||||
{
|
||||
if lr.is_valid() {
|
||||
if self.minimal_bundle(self.ranges[lr.index()].bundle) {
|
||||
min_bundles_assigned += 1;
|
||||
}
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
fixed_assigned += 1;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
total_regs += 1;
|
||||
}
|
||||
if min_bundles_assigned + fixed_assigned == total_regs {
|
||||
return Err(RegAllocError::TooManyLiveRegs);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
panic!("Could not allocate minimal bundle, but the allocation problem should be possible to solve");
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// If our bundle's weight is less than or equal to(*) the
|
||||
// evict cost, choose to split. Also pick splitting if
|
||||
// we're on our second or more attempt as long as the
|
||||
// bundle isn't minimal. Also pick splitting if the
|
||||
// conflict set is empty, meaning a fixed conflict that
|
||||
// can't be evicted.
|
||||
// we're on our second or more attempt and we didn't
|
||||
// allocate. Also pick splitting if the conflict set is
|
||||
// empty, meaning a fixed conflict that can't be evicted.
|
||||
//
|
||||
// (*) the "equal to" part is very important: it prevents
|
||||
// an infinite loop where two bundles with equal spill
|
||||
// cost continually evict each other in an infinite
|
||||
// allocation loop. In such a case, the first bundle in
|
||||
// wins, and the other splits.
|
||||
if (attempts >= 2 && !self.minimal_bundle(bundle))
|
||||
|| lowest_cost_evict_conflict_cost.is_none()
|
||||
|| self.bundle_spill_weight(bundle) <= lowest_cost_evict_conflict_cost.unwrap()
|
||||
//
|
||||
// Note that we don't split if the bundle is minimal.
|
||||
if !self.minimal_bundle(bundle)
|
||||
&& (attempts >= 2
|
||||
|| lowest_cost_evict_conflict_cost.is_none()
|
||||
|| self.bundle_spill_weight(bundle) <= lowest_cost_evict_conflict_cost.unwrap())
|
||||
{
|
||||
log::debug!(
|
||||
" -> deciding to split: our spill weight is {}",
|
||||
@@ -3161,47 +3202,7 @@ impl<'a, F: Function> Env<'a, F> {
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// A minimal bundle cannot be split.
|
||||
if self.minimal_bundle(bundle) {
|
||||
if let Requirement::Register(class) = req {
|
||||
// Check if this is a too-many-live-registers situation.
|
||||
let range = self.bundles[bundle.index()].ranges[0].range;
|
||||
let mut min_bundles_assigned = 0;
|
||||
let mut fixed_assigned = 0;
|
||||
let mut total_regs = 0;
|
||||
for preg in self.env.preferred_regs_by_class[class as u8 as usize]
|
||||
.iter()
|
||||
.chain(
|
||||
self.env.non_preferred_regs_by_class[class as u8 as usize].iter(),
|
||||
)
|
||||
{
|
||||
if let Some(&lr) = self.pregs[preg.index()]
|
||||
.allocations
|
||||
.btree
|
||||
.get(&LiveRangeKey::from_range(&range))
|
||||
{
|
||||
if lr.is_valid() {
|
||||
if self.minimal_bundle(self.ranges[lr.index()].bundle) {
|
||||
min_bundles_assigned += 1;
|
||||
}
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
fixed_assigned += 1;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
total_regs += 1;
|
||||
}
|
||||
if min_bundles_assigned + fixed_assigned == total_regs {
|
||||
return Err(RegAllocError::TooManyLiveRegs);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
if self.minimal_bundle(bundle) {
|
||||
self.dump_state();
|
||||
}
|
||||
assert!(!self.minimal_bundle(bundle));
|
||||
|
||||
self.split_and_requeue_bundle(bundle, split_at_point, requeue_with_reg);
|
||||
|
||||
return Ok(());
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
// Evict all bundles in `conflicting bundles` and try again.
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user