* Generalize unsigned `(x << k) >> k` optimization
Split the existing rule into three parts:
- A dual of the rule for `(x >> k) << k` that is only valid for unsigned
shifts.
- Known-bits analysis for `(band (uextend x) k)`.
- A new rule for converting `sextend` to `uextend` if the sign-extended
bits are masked out anyway.
The first two together cover the existing rule.
* Generalize signed `(x << k) >> k` optimization
* Review comments
* Generalize sign-extending shifts further
The shifts can be eliminated even if the shift amount isn't exactly
equal to the difference in bit-widths between the narrow and wide types.
* Add filetests
6cf7155052