//! Test command for `peepmatic`-generated peephole optimizers. use crate::subtest::{run_filecheck, Context, SubTest, SubtestResult}; use cranelift_codegen; use cranelift_codegen::ir::Function; use cranelift_codegen::print_errors::pretty_error; use cranelift_reader::TestCommand; use std::borrow::Cow; struct TestPreopt; pub fn subtest(parsed: &TestCommand) -> SubtestResult> { assert_eq!(parsed.command, "peepmatic"); if parsed.options.is_empty() { Ok(Box::new(TestPreopt)) } else { Err(format!("No options allowed on {}", parsed)) } } impl SubTest for TestPreopt { fn name(&self) -> &'static str { "peepmatic" } fn is_mutating(&self) -> bool { true } fn needs_isa(&self) -> bool { true } fn run(&self, func: Cow, context: &Context) -> SubtestResult<()> { let mut comp_ctx = cranelift_codegen::Context::for_function(func.into_owned()); let isa = context.isa.expect("preopt needs an ISA"); comp_ctx.compute_cfg(); comp_ctx .preopt(isa) .map_err(|e| pretty_error(&comp_ctx.func, context.isa, Into::into(e)))?; let text = &comp_ctx.func.display(isa).to_string(); log::debug!("After peepmatic-based simple_preopt:\n{}", text); // Only actually run the filecheck if peepmatic is enabled, because it // can generate slightly different code (alias a result vs replace an // instruction) than the non-peepmatic versions of peephole // optimizations. Note that the non-`peepmatic` results can be tested // with the `test simple_preopt` subtest. if cfg!(feature = "enable-peepmatic") { run_filecheck(&text, context) } else { Ok(()) } } }