* Run a `cargo update` over our dependencies
This'll notably fix a `cargo audit` error where we have a pinned version
of the `regex` crate which has a CVE assigned to it.
* Update to `object` and `hashbrown` crates
Prune some duplicate versions showing up from the previous `cargo update`
Also fix and extend the current implementation:
- AtomicRMWOp::Clr != AtomicRmwOp::And, as the input needs to be
inverted first.
- Inputs to the cmp for the RMWLoop case are sign-extended when
needed.
- Lower Xchg to Swp.
- Lower Sub to Add with a negated input.
- Added more runtests.
Copyright (c) 2022, Arm Limited.
x64 backend: add lowerings with load-op-store fusion.
These lowerings use the `OP [mem], reg` forms (or in AT&T syntax, `OP
%reg, (mem)`) -- i.e., x86 instructions that load from memory, perform
an ALU operation, and store the result, all in one instruction. Using
these instruction forms, we can merge three CLIF ops together: a load,
an arithmetic operation, and a store.
The recent work in #4061 introduced a notion of "unique uses" for CLIF
values that both simplified the load-op merging rules and allowed
loads to merge in some more places.
Unfortunately there's one factor that PR didn't account for: a unique
use at the CLIF level could become a multiple-use at the VCode level,
when a lowering uses a value multiple times!
Making this less error-prone in general is hard, because we don't know
the lowering in VCode until it's emitted, so we can't ahead-of-time
know that a value will be used multiple times and prevent its
merging. But we *can* know in the lowerings themselves when we're
doing this. At least we get a panic from regalloc when we get this
wrong; no bad code (uninitialized register being read) should ever
come from a backend bug like this.
This is still a bit less than ideal, but for now the fix is: in
`cmp_and_choose` in the x64 backend (which compares values, then
picks one or the other with a cmove), explicitly put values in
registers.
Fixes#4067 (thanks @Mrmaxmeier for the report!).
* Cranelift: fix#3953: rework single/multiple-use logic in lowering.
This PR addresses the longstanding issue with loads trying to merge
into compares on x86-64, and more generally, with the lowering
framework falsely recognizing "single uses" of one op by
another (which would normally allow merging of side-effecting ops like
loads) when there is *indirect* duplication.
To fix this, we replace the direct `value_uses` count with a
transitive notion of uniqueness (not unlike Rust's `&`/`&mut` and how
a `&mut` downgrades to `&` when accessed through another `&`!). A
value is used multiple times transitively if it has multiple direct
uses, or is used by another op that is used multiple times
transitively.
The canonical example of badness is:
```
v1 := load
v2 := ifcmp v1, ...
v3 := selectif v2, ...
v4 := selectif v2, ...
```
both `v3` and `v4` effectively merge the `ifcmp` (`v2`), so even
though the use of `v1` is "unique", it is codegenned twice. This is
why we ~~can't have nice things~~ can't merge loads into
compares (#3953).
There is quite a subtle and interesting design space around this
problem and how we might solve it. See the long doc-comment on
`ValueUseState` in this PR for more justification for the particular
design here. In particular, this design deliberately simplifies a bit
relative to an "optimal" solution: some uses can *become* unique
depending on merging, but we don't design our data structures for such
updates because that would require significant extra costly
tracking (some sort of transitive refcounting). For example, in the
above, if `selectif` somehow did not merge `ifcmp`, then we would only
codegen the `ifcmp` once into its result register (and use that
register twice); then the load *is* uniquely used, and could be
merged. But that requires transitioning from "multiple use" back to
"unique use" with careful tracking as we do pattern-matching, which
I've chosen to make out-of-scope here for now. In practice, I don't
think it will matter too much (and we can always improve later).
With this PR, we can now re-enable load-op merging for compares. A
subsequent commit does this.
* Update x64 backend to allow load-op merging for `cmp`.
* Update filetests.
* Add test for cmp-mem merging on x64.
* Comment fixes.
* Rework ValueUseState analysis for better performance.
* Update s390x filetest: iadd_ifcout cannot merge loads anymore because it has multiple outputs (ValueUseState limitation)
* Address review comments.
With these fixes, all this PR has to do is instantiate and run the
checker on the `regalloc2::Output`. This is off by default, and is
enabled by setting the `regalloc_checker` Cranelift option.
This restores the old functionality provided by e.g. the
`backtracking_checked` regalloc algorithm setting rather than
`backtracking` when we were still on regalloc.rs.
regalloc2 is a bit pickier about critical edges than regalloc.rs was,
because of how it inserts moves. In particular, if a branch has any
arguments (e.g., a conditional branch or br_table), its successors must
all have only one predecessor, so we can do edge moves at the top of
successor blocks rather than at the end of this block. Otherwise, moves
that semantically must come after the block's last uses (the branch's
args) would be placed before it.
This is almost always the case, because crit-edge splitting ensures that
if we have more than one succ, all our succs will have only one pred.
This is because branch kinds that take arguments (fixed args, not the
blockparam args) tend to have more than one successor: conditionals and
br_tables.
However, a fuzzbug recently illuminated one corner case I had missed: a
br_table can have *one* successor only, if it has a default target and
an empty table. In this case, crit-edge splitting will happily skip a
split and assume that we can insert edge moves at the end of the block
with the br_table. But this will fail.
regalloc2 explicitly checks this and bails with a panic, rather than
continue, so no miscompilation is possible; but without this fix, we
will get these panics on br_tables with empty tables.
Previously, the block successor accumulation and the blockparam branch
arg setup were decoupled. The lowering backend implicitly specified
the order of successor edges via its `MachTerminator` enum on the last
instruction in the block, while the `Lower` toplevel
machine-independent driver set up blockparam branch args in the edge
order seen in CLIF.
In some cases, these orders did not match -- for example, when the
conditional branch depended on an FP condition that was implemented by
swapping taken/not-taken edges and inverting the condition code.
This PR refactors the successor handling to be centralized in `Lower`
rather than flow through the terminator `MachInst`, and adds a
successor block and its blockparam args at the same time, ensuring the
orders match.
Following the merge of regalloc2 support, this became slower because we
are stricter about the critical-edge invariant, generating a separate
edge block for every out-edge even if two or more out-edges go to the
same successor (this is significant in cases of `br_table` with many
entries having the same target block, for example).
Many of those edge blocks are empty and end up collapsed by the
MachBuffer, which leads to a large set of aliased labels.
The invariant validation will dutifully iterate over all the data
structures at every step, validating all of our conditions. But this
gets way slower in the new context, to the point that we'll probably
have some fuzz timeouts.
This was pointed out in [1] but I missed removing this in #3989. Given
that `MachBuffer` has been around for nearly two years now, has been
fuzzed continuously with the invariant validation for that time, and
also has a correctness proof in the comments, it's probably reasonable
to remove this high (recently increased) cost from the fuzzing-specific
compilation configuration.
[1]
https://github.com/bytecodealliance/wasmtime/pull/3989#discussion_r847712263
Merge Mov32 and Mov64 into a single instruction parameterized by a new
OperandSize field. Also combine the Mov[K,N,Z] into a single instruction
with a new opcode to select between the operations.
Copyright (c) 2022, Arm Limited.
This PR switches Cranelift over to the new register allocator, regalloc2.
See [this document](https://gist.github.com/cfallin/08553421a91f150254fe878f67301801)
for a summary of the design changes. This switchover has implications for
core VCode/MachInst types and the lowering pass.
Overall, this change brings improvements to both compile time and speed of
generated code (runtime), as reported in #3942:
```
Benchmark Compilation (wallclock) Execution (wallclock)
blake3-scalar 25% faster 28% faster
blake3-simd no diff no diff
meshoptimizer 19% faster 17% faster
pulldown-cmark 17% faster no diff
bz2 15% faster no diff
SpiderMonkey, 21% faster 2% faster
fib(30)
clang.wasm 42% faster N/A
```
Issue #3963 identified a miscompilation with select in which the second
in the pair of `CMOV`s (one pair per `i128` register) used the wrong
flag. This change fixes the error in the x64 ISLE helper function
emitting these `CMOV` instructions.
This change moves the majority of the lowerings for CLIF's `load`
instruction over to ISLE. To do so, it also migrates the previous
mechanism for creating an `Amode` (`lower_to_amode`) to several ISLE
rules (see `to_amode`).
* Upgrade all crates to the Rust 2021 edition
I've personally started using the new format strings for things like
`panic!("some message {foo}")` or similar and have been upgrading crates
on a case-by-case basis, but I think it probably makes more sense to go
ahead and blanket upgrade everything so 2021 features are always
available.
* Fix compile of the C API
* Fix a warning
* Fix another warning
* Bump to 0.36.0
* Add a two-week delay to Wasmtime's release process
This commit is a proposal to update Wasmtime's release process with a
two-week delay from branching a release until it's actually officially
released. We've had two issues lately that came up which led to this proposal:
* In #3915 it was realized that changes just before the 0.35.0 release
weren't enough for an embedding use case, but the PR didn't meet the
expectations for a full patch release.
* At Fastly we were about to start rolling out a new version of Wasmtime
when over the weekend the fuzz bug #3951 was found. This led to the
desire internally to have a "must have been fuzzed for this long"
period of time for Wasmtime changes which we felt were better
reflected in the release process itself rather than something about
Fastly's own integration with Wasmtime.
This commit updates the automation for releases to unconditionally
create a `release-X.Y.Z` branch on the 5th of every month. The actual
release from this branch is then performed on the 20th of every month,
roughly two weeks later. This should provide a period of time to ensure
that all changes in a release are fuzzed for at least two weeks and
avoid any further surprises. This should also help with any last-minute
changes made just before a release if they need tweaking since
backporting to a not-yet-released branch is much easier.
Overall there are some new properties about Wasmtime with this proposal
as well:
* The `main` branch will always have a section in `RELEASES.md` which is
listed as "Unreleased" for us to fill out.
* The `main` branch will always be a version ahead of the latest
release. For example it will be bump pre-emptively as part of the
release process on the 5th where if `release-2.0.0` was created then
the `main` branch will have 3.0.0 Wasmtime.
* Dates for major versions are automatically updated in the
`RELEASES.md` notes.
The associated documentation for our release process is updated and the
various scripts should all be updated now as well with this commit.
* Add notes on a security patch
* Clarify security fixes shouldn't be previewed early on CI
* Run the GC smoketest with epoch support enabled as well.
* Handle safepoints in cold blocks properly.
Currently, the way that we find safepoint slots for a given instruction
relies on the instruction index order in the safepoint list matching the
order of instruction emission.
Previous to the introduction of cold-block support, this was trivially
satisfied by sorting the safepoint list: we emit instructions 0, 1, 2,
3, 4, ..., and so if we have safepoints at instructions 1 and 4, we will
encounter them in that order.
However, cold blocks are supported by swizzling the emission order at
the last moment (to avoid having to renumber instructions partway
through the compilation pipeline), so we actually emit instructions out
of index order when cold blocks are present.
Reference-type support in Wasm in particular uses cold blocks for
slowpaths, and has live refs and safepoints in these slowpaths, so we
can reliably "skip" a safepoint (not emit any metadata for it) in the
presence of reftype usage.
This PR fixes the emission code by building a map from instruction index
to safepoint index first, then doing lookups through this map, rather
than following along in-order as it emits instructions.
This change removes all variants of `load*_complex` and `store*_complex`
from Cranelift; this is a breaking change to the instructions exposed by
CLIF. The complete list of instructions removed is: `load_complex`,
`store_complex`, `uload8_complex`, `sload8_complex`, `istore8_complex`,
`sload8_complex`, `uload16_complex`, `sload16_complex`,
`istore16_complex`, `uload32_complex`, `sload32_complex`,
`istore32_complex`, `uload8x8_complex`, `sload8x8_complex`,
`sload16x4_complex`, `uload16x4_complex`, `uload32x2_complex`,
`sload32x2_complex`.
The rationale for this removal is that the Cranelift backend now has the
ability to pattern-match multiple upstream additions in order to
calculate the address to access. Previously, this was not possible so
the `*_complex` instructions were needed. Over time, these instructions
have fallen out of use in this repository, making the additional
overhead of maintaining them a chore.
Previous changes had ported the difficult "`select` based on an `fcmp`"
patterns to ISLE; this completes porting of `select` by moving over the
final two kinds of patterns:
- `select` based on an `icmp`
- `select` based on a value
* x64: port scalar `fcmp` to ISLE
Implement the CLIF lowering for the `fcmp` to ISLE. This adds a new
type-matcher, `ty_scalar_float`, for detecting uses of `F32` and `F64`.
* isle: rename `vec128` to `ty_vec12`
This refactoring changes the name of the `vec128` matcher function to
follow the `ty_*` convention of the other type matchers. It also makes
the helper an inline function call.
* x64: port vector `fcmp` to ISLE
Fuzz testing identified a lowering case for CLIF's `icmp` in which the
double use of a loaded operand resulted in a register allocation error.
This change manually adds `put_in_xmm` to avoid load-coalescing these
values and includes a CLIF filetest to trigger this issue. Closes#3951.
I opened #3953 to discuss a way in which this kind of mistake (i.e.,
forgetting to add `put_in_*` in certain situations) could be avoided.
This change is refactoring only--it should have no logic changes. As
discussed previously, prefixing all machine code instructions with
`x64_` will make it easier to identify what parts of the ISLE code
correspond to single instructions and what parts rely on helpers that
may emit more than one instruction.
Previously, we used the flags of `AND` for `SETcc`. This change uses
`TEST` instead, which discards the AND result but sets the flags needed
for `SETcc`. This reduces register pressure slightly for this sequence.
* x64: port GPR-held `icmp` to ISLE
* x64: port equality `icmp` for i128 type
* x64: port `icmp` for vector types
* x64: rename from_intcc to intcc_to_cc
The `fpcmp` helper in the x64 backend uses `put_in_xmm_mem` for one of
its operands, which allows the compiler to merge a load with the compare
instruction (`ucomiss` or `ucomisd`).
Unfortunately, as we saw in #2576 for the integer-compare case, this
does not work with our lowering algorithm because compares can be
lowered more than once (unlike all other instructions) to reproduce the
flags where needed. Merging a load into an op that executes more than
once is invalid in general (the two loads may observe different values,
which violates the original program semantics because there was only one
load originally).
This does not result in a miscompilation, but instead will cause a panic
at regalloc time because the register that should have been defined by
the separate load is never written (the load is never emitted
separately).
I think this (very subtle, easy to miss) condition was unfortunately not
ported over when we moved the logic in #3682.
The existing fcmp-of-load test in `cmp-mem-bug` (from #2576) does not
seem to trigger it, for a reason I haven't fully deduced. I just added
the verbatim function body (happens to come from `clang.wasm`) that
triggers the bug as a test.
Discovered while bringing up regalloc2 support. It's pretty unlikely to
hit by chance, which is why I think none of our fuzzing has hit it yet.
Previously (as in an hour ago) #3905 landed a new ability for fuzzing to
arbitrarily insert padding between functions. Running some fuzzers
locally though this instantly hit a lot of problems on AArch64 because
the arbitrary padding isn't aligned to 4 bytes like all other functions
are. To fix this issue appending functions now correctly aligns the
output as appropriate for the platform. The alignment argument for
appending was switched to `None` where `None` means "use the platform
default" and otherwise and explicit alignment can be specified for
inserting other data (like arbitrary padding or Windows unwind tables).
In #3849, I moved uextend over to ISLE in the x64 backend. Unfortunately, the lowering patterns had a bug in the i32-to-i64 special case (when we know the generating instruction zeroes the upper 32 bits): it wasn't actually special casing for an i32 source! This meant that e.g. zero extends of the results of i8 adds did not work properly.
This PR fixes the bug and updates the runtest for extends significantly to cover the narrow-value cases.
No security impact to Wasm as Wasm does not use narrow integer types.
Thanks @bjorn3 for reporting!
The current definition of `ValueSlice` is not usable, since any call to
a constructor returning a `ValueSlice` will extend the mutable borrow
on the context taken by the constructor call, with the result that it
cannot be passed to any other constructor ever.
Re-implement `ValueSlice` as a pair of a `ValueList` identifer plus an
offset into the list. This type can simply be copied without requiring
a borrow on the context.
This changes the output of the `lower` constructor from a
`ValueRegs` to a new `InstOutput` type, which is a vector
of `ValueRegs`.
Code in `lower_common` is updated to use this new type to
handle instructions with multiple outputs. All back-ends
are updated to use the new type.
This PR makes use of the new implicit-conversion feature of the ISLE DSL
that was introduced in #3807 in order to make the lowering rules
significantly simpler and more concise.
The basic idea is to eliminate the repetitive and mechanical use of
terms that convert from one type to another when there is only one real
way to do the conversion -- for example, to go from a `WritableReg` to a
`Reg`, the only sensible way is to use `writable_reg_to_reg`.
This PR generally takes any term of the form "A_to_B" and makes it an
automatic conversion, as well as some others that are similar in spirit.
The notable exception to the pure-value-convsion category is the
`put_in_reg` family of operations, which actually do have side-effects.
However, as noted in the doc additions in #3807, this is fine as long as
the side-effects are idempotent. And on balance, making `put_in_reg`
automatic is a significant clarity win -- together with other operand
converters, it enables rules like:
```
;; Add two registers.
(rule (lower (has_type (fits_in_64 ty)
(iadd x y)))
(add ty x y))
```
There may be other converters that we could define to make the rules
even simpler; we can make such improvements as we think of them, but
this should be a good start!
* x64: port `select` using an FP comparison to ISLE
This change includes quite a few interlocking parts, required mainly by
the current x64 conventions in ISLE:
- it adds a way to emit a `cmove` with multiple OR-ing conditions;
because x64 ISLE cannot currently safely emit a comparison followed
by several jumps, this adds `MachInst::CmoveOr` and
`MachInst::XmmCmoveOr` macro instructions. Unfortunately, these macro
instructions hide the multi-instruction sequence in `lower.isle`
- to properly keep track of what instructions consume and produce
flags, @cfallin added a way to pass around variants of
`ConsumesFlags` and `ProducesFlags`--these changes affect all
backends
- then, to lower the `fcmp + select` CLIF, this change adds several
`cmove*_from_values` helpers that perform all of the awkward
conversions between `Value`, `ValueReg`, `Reg`, and `Gpr/Xmm`; one
upside is that now these lowerings have much-improved documentation
explaining why the various `FloatCC` and `CC` choices are made the
the way they are.
Co-authored-by: Chris Fallin <chris@cfallin.org>
* Enable SSE 4.2 unconditionally
Fuzzing over the weekend found that `i64x2` comparison operators
require `pcmpgtq` which is an SSE 4.2 instruction. Along the lines of #3816
this commit unconditionally enables and requires SSE 4.2 for compilation
and fuzzing. It will no longer be possible to create a compiler for
x86_64 with simd enabled if SSE 4.2 is disabled.
* Update comment
