This commit removes support for the `userfaultfd` or "uffd" syscall on
Linux. This support was originally added for users migrating from Lucet
to Wasmtime, but the recent developments of kernel-supported
copy-on-write support for memory initialization wound up being more
appropriate for these use cases than usefaultfd. The main reason for
moving to copy-on-write initialization are:
* The `userfaultfd` feature was never necessarily intended for this
style of use case with wasm and was susceptible to subtle and rare
bugs that were extremely difficult to track down. We were never 100%
certain that there were kernel bugs related to userfaultfd but the
suspicion never went away.
* Handling faults with userfaultfd was always slow and single-threaded.
Only one thread could handle faults and traveling to user-space to
handle faults is inherently slower than handling them all in the
kernel. The single-threaded aspect in particular presented a
significant scaling bottleneck for embeddings that want to run many
wasm instances in parallel.
* One of the major benefits of userfaultfd was lazy initialization of
wasm linear memory which is also achieved with the copy-on-write
initialization support we have right now.
* One of the suspected benefits of userfaultfd was less frobbing of the
kernel vma structures when wasm modules are instantiated. Currently
the copy-on-write support has a mitigation where we attempt to reuse
the memory images where possible to avoid changing vma structures.
When comparing this to userfaultfd's performance it was found that
kernel modifications of vmas aren't a worrisome bottleneck so
copy-on-write is suitable for this as well.
Overall there are no remaining benefits that userfaultfd gives that
copy-on-write doesn't, and copy-on-write solves a major downsides of
userfaultfd, the scaling issue with a single faulting thread.
Additionally copy-on-write support seems much more robust in terms of
kernel implementation since it's only using standard memory-management
syscalls which are heavily exercised. Finally copy-on-write support
provides a new bonus where read-only memory in WebAssembly can be mapped
directly to the same kernel cache page, even amongst many wasm instances
of the same module, which was never possible with userfaultfd.
In light of all this it's expected that all users of userfaultfd should
migrate to the copy-on-write initialization of Wasmtime (which is
enabled by default).
* Remove the `ModuleLimits` pooling configuration structure
This commit is an attempt to improve the usability of the pooling
allocator by removing the need to configure a `ModuleLimits` structure.
Internally this structure has limits on all forms of wasm constructs but
this largely bottoms out in the size of an allocation for an instance in
the instance pooling allocator. Maintaining this list of limits can be
cumbersome as modules may get tweaked over time and there's otherwise no
real reason to limit the number of globals in a module since the main
goal is to limit the memory consumption of a `VMContext` which can be
done with a memory allocation limit rather than fine-tuned control over
each maximum and minimum.
The new approach taken in this commit is to remove `ModuleLimits`. Some
fields, such as `tables`, `table_elements` , `memories`, and
`memory_pages` are moved to `InstanceLimits` since they're still
enforced at runtime. A new field `size` is added to `InstanceLimits`
which indicates, in bytes, the maximum size of the `VMContext`
allocation. If the size of a `VMContext` for a module exceeds this value
then instantiation will fail.
This involved adding a few more checks to `{Table, Memory}::new_static`
to ensure that the minimum size is able to fit in the allocation, since
previously modules were validated at compile time of the module that
everything fit and that validation no longer happens (it happens at
runtime).
A consequence of this commit is that Wasmtime will have no built-in way
to reject modules at compile time if they'll fail to be instantiated
within a particular pooling allocator configuration. Instead a module
must attempt instantiation see if a failure happens.
* Fix benchmark compiles
* Fix some doc links
* Fix a panic by ensuring modules have limited tables/memories
* Review comments
* Add back validation at `Module` time instantiation is possible
This allows for getting an early signal at compile time that a module
will never be instantiable in an engine with matching settings.
* Provide a better error message when sizes are exceeded
Improve the error message when an instance size exceeds the maximum by
providing a breakdown of where the bytes are all going and why the large
size is being requested.
* Try to fix test in qemu
* Flag new test as 64-bit only
Sizes are all specific to 64-bit right now
* Consolidate methods of memory initialization
This commit consolidates the few locations that we have which are
performing memory initialization. Namely the uffd logic for creating
paged memory as well as the memfd logic for creating a memory image now
share an implementation to avoid duplicating bounds-checks or other
validation conditions. The main purpose of this commit is to fix a
fuzz-bug where a multiplication overflowed. The overflow itself was
benign but it seemed better to fix the overflow in only one place
instead of multiple.
The overflow in question is specifically when an initializer is checked
to be statically out-of-bounds and multiplies a memory's minimum size by
the wasm page size, returning the result as a `u64`. For
memory64-memories of size `1 << 48` this multiplication will overflow.
This was actually a preexisting bug with the `try_paged_init` function
which was copied for memfd, but cropped up here since memfd is used more
often than paged initialization. The fix here is to skip validation of
the `end` index if the size of memory is `1 << 64` since if the `end`
index can be represented as a `u64` then it's in-bounds. This is
somewhat of an esoteric case, though, since a memory of minimum size `1
<< 64` can't ever exist (we can't even ask the os for that much memory,
and even if we could it would fail).
* Fix memfd test
* Fix some tests
* Remove InitMemory enum
* Add an `is_segmented` helper method
* More clear variable name
* Make arguments to `init_memory` more descriptive
This fixes a bug in the memfd-related management of a linear memory
where for dynamic memories memfd wasn't informed of the extra room that
the dynamic memory could grow into, only the actual size of linear
memory, which ended up tripping an assert once the memory was grown. The
fix here is pretty simple which is to factor in this extra space when
passing the allocation size to the creation of the `MemFdSlot`.
* Add a configuration option to force "static" memories
In poking around at some things earlier today I realized that one
configuration option for memories we haven't exposed from embeddings
like the CLI is to forcibly limit the size of memory growth and force
using a static memory style. This means that the CLI, for example, can't
limit memory growth by default and memories are only limited in size by
what the OS can give and the wasm's own memory type. This configuration
option means that the CLI can artificially limit the size of wasm linear
memories.
Additionally another motivation for this is for testing out various
codegen ramifications of static/dynamic memories. This is the only way
to force a static memory, by default, for wasm64 memories with no
maximum size listed for example.
* Review feedback
This commit fixes an issue in Cranelift where legalization of
`heap_addr` instructions (used by wasm to represent heap accesses) could
be off-by-two where loads that should be valid were actually treated as
invalid. The bug here happened in an optimization where tests against
odd constants were being altered to tests against even constants by
subtracting one from the limit instead of adding one to the limit. The
comment around this area has been updated in accordance with a little
more math-stuff as well to help future readers.
* Always call the resource limiter for memory allocations
Previously the memory64 support meant that sometimes we wouldn't call
the limiter because the calculation for the minimum size requested would
overflow. Instead Wasmtime now wraps the minimum size in something a bit
smaller than the address space to inform the limiter, which should
guarantee that although the limiter is called with "incorrect"
information it's effectively correct and is allowed a pass to learn that
a massive memory was requested.
This was found by the fuzzers where a request for the absolute maximal
size of 64-bit memory (e.g. the entire 64-bit address space) didn't
actually invoke the limiter which means that we mis-classified an
instantiation error and didn't realize that it was an OOM.
* Add a test
* Implement the memory64 proposal in Wasmtime
This commit implements the WebAssembly [memory64 proposal][proposal] in
both Wasmtime and Cranelift. In terms of work done Cranelift ended up
needing very little work here since most of it was already prepared for
64-bit memories at one point or another. Most of the work in Wasmtime is
largely refactoring, changing a bunch of `u32` values to something else.
A number of internal and public interfaces are changing as a result of
this commit, for example:
* Acessors on `wasmtime::Memory` that work with pages now all return
`u64` unconditionally rather than `u32`. This makes it possible to
accommodate 64-bit memories with this API, but we may also want to
consider `usize` here at some point since the host can't grow past
`usize`-limited pages anyway.
* The `wasmtime::Limits` structure is removed in favor of
minimum/maximum methods on table/memory types.
* Many libcall intrinsics called by jit code now unconditionally take
`u64` arguments instead of `u32`. Return values are `usize`, however,
since the return value, if successful, is always bounded by host
memory while arguments can come from any guest.
* The `heap_addr` clif instruction now takes a 64-bit offset argument
instead of a 32-bit one. It turns out that the legalization of
`heap_addr` already worked with 64-bit offsets, so this change was
fairly trivial to make.
* The runtime implementation of mmap-based linear memories has changed
to largely work in `usize` quantities in its API and in bytes instead
of pages. This simplifies various aspects and reflects that
mmap-memories are always bound by `usize` since that's what the host
is using to address things, and additionally most calculations care
about bytes rather than pages except for the very edge where we're
going to/from wasm.
Overall I've tried to minimize the amount of `as` casts as possible,
using checked `try_from` and checked arithemtic with either error
handling or explicit `unwrap()` calls to tell us about bugs in the
future. Most locations have relatively obvious things to do with various
implications on various hosts, and I think they should all be roughly of
the right shape but time will tell. I mostly relied on the compiler
complaining that various types weren't aligned to figure out
type-casting, and I manually audited some of the more obvious locations.
I suspect we have a number of hidden locations that will panic on 32-bit
hosts if 64-bit modules try to run there, but otherwise I think we
should be generally ok (famous last words). In any case I wouldn't want
to enable this by default naturally until we've fuzzed it for some time.
In terms of the actual underlying implementation, no one should expect
memory64 to be all that fast. Right now it's implemented with
"dynamic" heaps which have a few consequences:
* All memory accesses are bounds-checked. I'm not sure how aggressively
Cranelift tries to optimize out bounds checks, but I suspect not a ton
since we haven't stressed this much historically.
* Heaps are always precisely sized. This means that every call to
`memory.grow` will incur a `memcpy` of memory from the old heap to the
new. We probably want to at least look into `mremap` on Linux and
otherwise try to implement schemes where dynamic heaps have some
reserved pages to grow into to help amortize the cost of
`memory.grow`.
The memory64 spec test suite is scheduled to now run on CI, but as with
all the other spec test suites it's really not all that comprehensive.
I've tried adding more tests for basic things as I've had to implement
guards for them, but I wouldn't really consider the testing adequate
from just this PR itself. I did try to take care in one test to actually
allocate a 4gb+ heap and then avoid running that in the pooling
allocator or in emulation because otherwise that may fail or take
excessively long.
[proposal]: https://github.com/WebAssembly/memory64/blob/master/proposals/memory64/Overview.md
* Fix some tests
* More test fixes
* Fix wasmtime tests
* Fix doctests
* Revert to 32-bit immediate offsets in `heap_addr`
This commit updates the generation of addresses in wasm code to always
use 32-bit offsets for `heap_addr`, and if the calculated offset is
bigger than 32-bits we emit a manual add with an overflow check.
* Disable memory64 for spectest fuzzing
* Fix wrong offset being added to heap addr
* More comments!
* Clarify bytes/pages
* Add guard pages to the front of linear memories
This commit implements a safety feature for Wasmtime to place guard
pages before the allocation of all linear memories. Guard pages placed
after linear memories are typically present for performance (at least)
because it can help elide bounds checks. Guard pages before a linear
memory, however, are never strictly needed for performance or features.
The intention of a preceding guard page is to help insulate against bugs
in Cranelift or other code generators, such as CVE-2021-32629.
This commit adds a `Config::guard_before_linear_memory` configuration
option, defaulting to `true`, which indicates whether guard pages should
be present both before linear memories as well as afterwards. Guard
regions continue to be controlled by
`{static,dynamic}_memory_guard_size` methods.
The implementation here affects both on-demand allocated memories as
well as the pooling allocator for memories. For on-demand memories this
adjusts the size of the allocation as well as adjusts the calculations
for the base pointer of the wasm memory. For the pooling allocator this
will place a singular extra guard region at the very start of the
allocation for memories. Since linear memories in the pooling allocator
are contiguous every memory already had a preceding guard region in
memory, it was just the previous memory's guard region afterwards. Only
the first memory needed this extra guard.
I've attempted to write some tests to help test all this, but this is
all somewhat tricky to test because the settings are pretty far away
from the actual behavior. I think, though, that the tests added here
should help cover various use cases and help us have confidence in
tweaking the various `Config` settings beyond their defaults.
Note that this also contains a semantic change where
`InstanceLimits::memory_reservation_size` has been removed. Instead this
field is now inferred from the `static_memory_maximum_size` and guard
size settings. This should hopefully remove some duplication in these
settings, canonicalizing on the guard-size/static-size settings as the
way to control memory sizes and virtual reservations.
* Update config docs
* Fix a typo
* Fix benchmark
* Fix wasmtime-runtime tests
* Fix some more tests
* Try to fix uffd failing test
* Review items
* Tweak 32-bit defaults
Makes the pooling allocator a bit more reasonable by default on 32-bit
with these settings.
