* Manually rename BasicBlock to BlockPredecessor
BasicBlock is a pair of (Ebb, Inst) that is used to represent the
basic block subcomponent of an Ebb that is a predecessor to an Ebb.
Eventually we will be able to remove this struct, but for now it
makes sense to give it a non-conflicting name so that we can start
to transition Ebb to represent a basic block.
I have not updated any comments that refer to BasicBlock, as
eventually we will remove BlockPredecessor and replace with Block,
which is a basic block, so the comments will become correct.
* Manually rename SSABuilder block types to avoid conflict
SSABuilder has its own Block and BlockData types. These along with
associated identifier will cause conflicts in a later commit, so
they are renamed to be more verbose here.
* Automatically rename 'Ebb' to 'Block' in *.rs
* Automatically rename 'EBB' to 'block' in *.rs
* Automatically rename 'ebb' to 'block' in *.rs
* Automatically rename 'extended basic block' to 'basic block' in *.rs
* Automatically rename 'an basic block' to 'a basic block' in *.rs
* Manually update comment for `Block`
`Block`'s wikipedia article required an update.
* Automatically rename 'an `Block`' to 'a `Block`' in *.rs
* Automatically rename 'extended_basic_block' to 'basic_block' in *.rs
* Automatically rename 'ebb' to 'block' in *.clif
* Manually rename clif constant that contains 'ebb' as substring to avoid conflict
* Automatically rename filecheck uses of 'EBB' to 'BB'
'regex: EBB' -> 'regex: BB'
'$EBB' -> '$BB'
* Automatically rename 'EBB' 'Ebb' to 'block' in *.clif
* Automatically rename 'an block' to 'a block' in *.clif
* Fix broken testcase when function name length increases
Test function names are limited to 16 characters. This causes
the new longer name to be truncated and fail a filecheck test. An
outdated comment was also fixed.
* Add x86 encodings for `bint` converting to `i8` and `i16`
* Introduce tests for many multi-value returns
* Support arbitrary numbers of return values
This commit implements support for returning an arbitrary number of return
values from a function. During legalization we transform multi-value signatures
to take a struct return ("sret") return pointer, instead of returning its values
in registers. Callers allocate the sret space in their stack frame and pass a
pointer to it into the caller, and once the caller returns to them, they load
the return values back out of the sret stack slot. The callee's return
operations are legalized to store the return values through the given sret
pointer.
* Keep track of old, pre-legalized signatures
When legalizing a call or return for its new legalized signature, we may need to
look at the old signature in order to figure out how to legalize the call or
return.
* Add test for multi-value returns and `call_indirect`
* Encode bool -> int x86 instructions in a loop
* Rename `Signature::uses_sret` to `Signature::uses_struct_return_param`
* Rename `p` to `param`
* Add a clarifiying comment in `num_registers_required`
* Rename `num_registers_required` to `num_return_registers_required`
* Re-add newline
* Handle already-assigned parameters in `num_return_registers_required`
* Document what some debug assertions are checking for
* Make "illegalizing" closure's control flow simpler
* Add unit tests and comments for our rounding-up-to-the-next-multiple-of-a-power-of-2 function
* Use `append_isnt_arg` instead of doing the same thing manually
* Fix grammar in comment
* Add `Signature::uses_special_{param,return}` helper functions
* Inline the definition of `legalize_type_for_sret_load` for readability
* Move sret legalization debug assertions out into their own function
* Add `round_up_to_multiple_of_type_align` helper for readability
* Add a debug assertion that we aren't removing the wrong return value
* Rename `RetPtr` stack slots to `StructReturnSlot`
* Make `legalize_type_for_sret_store` more symmetrical to `legalized_type_for_sret`
* rustfmt
* Remove unnecessary loop labels
* Do not pre-assign offsets to struct return stack slots
Instead, let the existing frame layout algorithm decide where they should go.
* Expand "sret" into explicit "struct return" in doc comment
* typo: "than" -> "then" in comment
* Fold test's debug message into the assertion itself
