This commit is intended to update wasmparser to 0.59.0. This primarily
includes bytecodealliance/wasm-tools#40 which is a large update to how
parsing and validation works. The impact on Wasmtime is pretty small at
this time, but over time I'd like to refactor the internals here to lean
more heavily on that upstream wasmparser refactoring.
For now, though, the intention is to get on the train of wasmparser's
latest `main` branch to ensure we get bug fixes and such.
As part of this update a few other crates and such were updated. This is
primarily to handle the new encoding of `ref.is_null` where the type is
not part of the instruction encoding any more.
* Wasmtime 0.15.0 and Cranelift 0.62.0. (#1398)
* Bump more ad-hoc versions.
* Add build.rs to wasi-common's Cargo.toml.
* Update the env var name in more places.
* Remove a redundant echo.
This patch updates or removes all references to the Cranelift repository. It affects links in README documents, issues that were transferred to the Wasmtime repository, CI badges, and a small bunch of sundry items.
* All: Drop 'basic-blocks' feature
This makes it so that 'basic-blocks' cannot be disabled and we can
start assuming it everywhere.
* Tests: Replace non-bb filetests with bb version
* Tests: Adapt solver-fixedconflict filetests to use basic blocks
This commit moves the cranelift tests and tools from the `wabt` crate on
crates.io (which compiles the wabt C++ codebase) to the `wat` crate on
crates.io which is a Rust parser for the `*.wat` format. This was
motivated by me noticing that release builds on Windows are ~5 minutes
longer than Linux builds, and local timing graphs showed that `wabt-sys`
was by far the longest build step in the build process.
This commit changes the `clif-util` binary where the `--enable-simd`
flag is no longer respected with the text format as input, since the
`wat` crate has no feature gating. This was already sort of not
respected, though, since `--enable-simd` wasn't consulted for binary
inputs which `clif-util` supports as well. If this isn't ok though then
it should be ok to close this PR!
* Bump version to 0.48.0
* Re-enable `byteorder`'s default features.
The code uses `WriteBytesExt` which depends on the `std` feature being
enabled. So for now, just enable `std`.
The failure crate invents its own traits that don't use
std::error::Error (because failure predates certain features added to
Error); this prevents using ? on an error from failure in a function
using Error. The thiserror crate integrates with the standard Error
trait instead.