* Update the `*.wast` runner to use the `wasmtime` API
This commit migrates the `wasmtime-wast` crate, which executes `*.wast`
test suites, to use the `wasmtime` crate exclusively instead of the raw
support provided by the `wasmtime-*` family of crates.
The primary motivation for this change is to use `*.wast` test to test
the support for interface types, but interface types is only being added
in the `wasmtime` crate for now rather than all throughout the core
crates. This means that without this transition it's much more difficult
to write tests for wasm interface types!
A secondary motivation for this is that it's testing the support we
provide to users through the `wasmtime` crate, since that's the
expectation of what most users would use rather than the raw
`wasmtime-*` crates.
* Run rustfmt
* Fix the multi example
* Handle v128 values in the `wasmtime` crate
Ensure that we allocate 128-bit stack slots instead of 64-bit stack
slots.
* Update to master
* Add comment
* Tweak the API of the `Val` type
A few updates to the API of the `Val` type:
* Added a payload for `V128`.
* Replace existing accessor methods with `Option`-returning versions.
* Add `unwrap_xxx` family of methods to extract a value and panic.
* Remove `Into` conversions which panic, since panicking in `From` or
`Into` isn't idiomatic in Rust
* Add documentation to all methods/values/enums/etc.
* Rename `Val::default` to `Val::null`
* Run rustfmt
* Review comments
* Migrate back to `std::` stylistically
This commit moves away from idioms such as `alloc::` and `core::` as
imports of standard data structures and types. Instead it migrates all
crates to uniformly use `std::` for importing standard data structures
and types. This also removes the `std` and `core` features from all
crates to and removes any conditional checking for `feature = "std"`
All of this support was previously added in #407 in an effort to make
wasmtime/cranelift "`no_std` compatible". Unfortunately though this
change comes at a cost:
* The usage of `alloc` and `core` isn't idiomatic. Especially trying to
dual between types like `HashMap` from `std` as well as from
`hashbrown` causes imports to be surprising in some cases.
* Unfortunately there was no CI check that crates were `no_std`, so none
of them actually were. Many crates still imported from `std` or
depended on crates that used `std`.
It's important to note, however, that **this does not mean that wasmtime
will not run in embedded environments**. The style of the code today and
idioms aren't ready in Rust to support this degree of multiplexing and
makes it somewhat difficult to keep up with the style of `wasmtime`.
Instead it's intended that embedded runtime support will be added as
necessary. Currently only `std` is necessary to build `wasmtime`, and
platforms that natively need to execute `wasmtime` will need to use a
Rust target that supports `std`. Note though that not all of `std` needs
to be supported, but instead much of it could be configured off to
return errors, and `wasmtime` would be configured to gracefully handle
errors.
The goal of this PR is to move `wasmtime` back to idiomatic usage of
features/`std`/imports/etc and help development in the short-term.
Long-term when platform concerns arise (if any) they can be addressed by
moving back to `no_std` crates (but fixing the issues mentioned above)
or ensuring that the target in Rust has `std` available.
* Start filling out platform support doc
As discussed in https://github.com/bytecodealliance/cranelift/pull/1226, the context of Cranelift errors is lost after exiting the scope containing the Cranelift function. `CodegenError` then only contains something like `inst2: arg 0 (v4) has type i16x8, expected i8x16`, which is rarely enough information for investigating a codegen failure. This change uses Cranelift's `pretty_error` function to improve the error messages wrapped in `CompileError`; `CompileError` has lost the reference to `CodegenError` due to `pretty_error` taking ownership but this seems preferable since no backtrace is attached and losing the pretty-printed context would be worse (if `CodegenError` gains a `Backtrace` or implements `Clone` we can revisit this).
