The sse_cmp_op rule had cases that would produce SseOperand values that aren't legal to use with MInst.XmmRmR, and was only used in vector_all_ones when constructing an XmmRmR value. Additionally, vector_all_ones always called sse_cmp_op with the same type, so the other cases were redundant.
The solution in this PR is to remove sse_cmp_op entirely and inline a call to x64_pcmpeqd directly in vector_all_ones, and remove the unused argument from vector_all_ones.
All of the `*_imm` instructions are rewritten during legalization to an
explicit `iconst` plus the general form of the operator, so backends
never see them. Therefore these ISLE rules in the x64 backend can never
match anything.
* Add a test for iadd_pairwise with swiden input
* Implement iadd_pairwise for swiden_{low,high} input
* Add a test case for iadd_pairwise with uwiden input
* Implement iadd_pairwise with uwiden
* Add a test for the existing behavior of fcvt_from_unit
* Migrate the I8, I16, I32 cases of fcvt_from_uint
* Implement the I64 case of fcvt_from_uint
* Add a test for the existing behavior of fcvt_from_uint.f64x2
* Migrate fcvt_from_uint.f64x2 to ISLE
* Lower the last case of `fcvt_from_uint`
* Add a test for `fcvt_from_uint`
* Finish lowering fcmp_from_uint
* Format
* Cranelift: Add instructions for getting the current stack/frame pointers and return address
This is the initial part of https://github.com/bytecodealliance/wasmtime/issues/4535
* x64: Remove `Amode::RbpOffset` and use `Amode::ImmReg` instead
We just special case getting operands from `Amode`s now.
* Fix s390x `get_return_address`; require `preserve_frame_pointers=true`
* Assert that `Amode::ImmRegRegShift` doesn't use rbp/rsp
* Handle non-allocatable registers in Amode::with_allocs
* Use "stack" instead of "r15" on s390x
* r14 is an allocatable register on s390x, so it shouldn't be used with `MovPReg`
* Cranellift: remove Baldrdash support and related features.
As noted in Mozilla's bugzilla bug 1781425 [1], the SpiderMonkey team
has recently determined that their current form of integration with
Cranelift is too hard to maintain, and they have chosen to remove it
from their codebase. If and when they decide to build updated support
for Cranelift, they will adopt different approaches to several details
of the integration.
In the meantime, after discussion with the SpiderMonkey folks, they
agree that it makes sense to remove the bits of Cranelift that exist
to support the integration ("Baldrdash"), as they will not need
them. Many of these bits are difficult-to-maintain special cases that
are not actually tested in Cranelift proper: for example, the
Baldrdash integration required Cranelift to emit function bodies
without prologues/epilogues, and instead communicate very precise
information about the expected frame size and layout, then stitched
together something post-facto. This was brittle and caused a lot of
incidental complexity ("fallthrough returns", the resulting special
logic in block-ordering); this is just one example. As another
example, one particular Baldrdash ABI variant processed stack args in
reverse order, so our ABI code had to support both traversal
orders. We had a number of other Baldrdash-specific settings as well
that did various special things.
This PR removes Baldrdash ABI support, the `fallthrough_return`
instruction, and pulls some threads to remove now-unused bits as a
result of those two, with the understanding that the SpiderMonkey folks
will build new functionality as needed in the future and we can perhaps
find cleaner abstractions to make it all work.
[1] https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1781425
* Review feedback.
* Fix (?) DWARF debug tests: add `--disable-cache` to wasmtime invocations.
The debugger tests invoke `wasmtime` from within each test case under
the control of a debugger (gdb or lldb). Some of these tests started to
inexplicably fail in CI with unrelated changes, and the failures were
only inconsistently reproducible locally. It seems to be cache related:
if we disable cached compilation on the nested `wasmtime` invocations,
the tests consistently pass.
* Review feedback.
* cranelift: Reorganize test suite
Group some SIMD operations by instruction.
* cranelift: Deduplicate some shift tests
Also, new tests with the mod behaviour
* aarch64: Lower shifts with mod behaviour
* x64: Lower shifts with mod behaviour
* wasmtime: Don't mask SIMD shifts
* x64: Add VEX Instruction Encoder
This uses a similar builder pattern to the EVEX Encoder.
Does not yet support memory accesses.
* x64: Add FMA Flag
* x64: Implement SIMD `fma`
* x64: Use 4 register Vex Inst
* x64: Reorder VEX pretty print args
* x64: port `atomic_rmw` to ISLE
This change ports `atomic_rmw` to ISLE for the x64 backend. It does not
change the lowering in any way, though it seems possible that the fixed
regs need not be as fixed and that there are opportunities for single
instruction lowerings. It does rename `inst_common::AtomicRmwOp` to
`MachAtomicRmwOp` to disambiguate with the IR enum with the same name.
* x64: remove remaining hardcoded register constraints for `atomic_rmw`
* x64: use `SyntheticAmode` in `AtomicRmwSeq`
* review: add missing reg collector for amode
* review: collect memory registers in the 'late' phase
x64 backend: add lowerings with load-op-store fusion.
These lowerings use the `OP [mem], reg` forms (or in AT&T syntax, `OP
%reg, (mem)`) -- i.e., x86 instructions that load from memory, perform
an ALU operation, and store the result, all in one instruction. Using
these instruction forms, we can merge three CLIF ops together: a load,
an arithmetic operation, and a store.
The recent work in #4061 introduced a notion of "unique uses" for CLIF
values that both simplified the load-op merging rules and allowed
loads to merge in some more places.
Unfortunately there's one factor that PR didn't account for: a unique
use at the CLIF level could become a multiple-use at the VCode level,
when a lowering uses a value multiple times!
Making this less error-prone in general is hard, because we don't know
the lowering in VCode until it's emitted, so we can't ahead-of-time
know that a value will be used multiple times and prevent its
merging. But we *can* know in the lowerings themselves when we're
doing this. At least we get a panic from regalloc when we get this
wrong; no bad code (uninitialized register being read) should ever
come from a backend bug like this.
This is still a bit less than ideal, but for now the fix is: in
`cmp_and_choose` in the x64 backend (which compares values, then
picks one or the other with a cmove), explicitly put values in
registers.
Fixes#4067 (thanks @Mrmaxmeier for the report!).
* Cranelift: fix#3953: rework single/multiple-use logic in lowering.
This PR addresses the longstanding issue with loads trying to merge
into compares on x86-64, and more generally, with the lowering
framework falsely recognizing "single uses" of one op by
another (which would normally allow merging of side-effecting ops like
loads) when there is *indirect* duplication.
To fix this, we replace the direct `value_uses` count with a
transitive notion of uniqueness (not unlike Rust's `&`/`&mut` and how
a `&mut` downgrades to `&` when accessed through another `&`!). A
value is used multiple times transitively if it has multiple direct
uses, or is used by another op that is used multiple times
transitively.
The canonical example of badness is:
```
v1 := load
v2 := ifcmp v1, ...
v3 := selectif v2, ...
v4 := selectif v2, ...
```
both `v3` and `v4` effectively merge the `ifcmp` (`v2`), so even
though the use of `v1` is "unique", it is codegenned twice. This is
why we ~~can't have nice things~~ can't merge loads into
compares (#3953).
There is quite a subtle and interesting design space around this
problem and how we might solve it. See the long doc-comment on
`ValueUseState` in this PR for more justification for the particular
design here. In particular, this design deliberately simplifies a bit
relative to an "optimal" solution: some uses can *become* unique
depending on merging, but we don't design our data structures for such
updates because that would require significant extra costly
tracking (some sort of transitive refcounting). For example, in the
above, if `selectif` somehow did not merge `ifcmp`, then we would only
codegen the `ifcmp` once into its result register (and use that
register twice); then the load *is* uniquely used, and could be
merged. But that requires transitioning from "multiple use" back to
"unique use" with careful tracking as we do pattern-matching, which
I've chosen to make out-of-scope here for now. In practice, I don't
think it will matter too much (and we can always improve later).
With this PR, we can now re-enable load-op merging for compares. A
subsequent commit does this.
* Update x64 backend to allow load-op merging for `cmp`.
* Update filetests.
* Add test for cmp-mem merging on x64.
* Comment fixes.
* Rework ValueUseState analysis for better performance.
* Update s390x filetest: iadd_ifcout cannot merge loads anymore because it has multiple outputs (ValueUseState limitation)
* Address review comments.
This PR switches Cranelift over to the new register allocator, regalloc2.
See [this document](https://gist.github.com/cfallin/08553421a91f150254fe878f67301801)
for a summary of the design changes. This switchover has implications for
core VCode/MachInst types and the lowering pass.
Overall, this change brings improvements to both compile time and speed of
generated code (runtime), as reported in #3942:
```
Benchmark Compilation (wallclock) Execution (wallclock)
blake3-scalar 25% faster 28% faster
blake3-simd no diff no diff
meshoptimizer 19% faster 17% faster
pulldown-cmark 17% faster no diff
bz2 15% faster no diff
SpiderMonkey, 21% faster 2% faster
fib(30)
clang.wasm 42% faster N/A
```
This change moves the majority of the lowerings for CLIF's `load`
instruction over to ISLE. To do so, it also migrates the previous
mechanism for creating an `Amode` (`lower_to_amode`) to several ISLE
rules (see `to_amode`).
Previous changes had ported the difficult "`select` based on an `fcmp`"
patterns to ISLE; this completes porting of `select` by moving over the
final two kinds of patterns:
- `select` based on an `icmp`
- `select` based on a value
* x64: port scalar `fcmp` to ISLE
Implement the CLIF lowering for the `fcmp` to ISLE. This adds a new
type-matcher, `ty_scalar_float`, for detecting uses of `F32` and `F64`.
* isle: rename `vec128` to `ty_vec12`
This refactoring changes the name of the `vec128` matcher function to
follow the `ty_*` convention of the other type matchers. It also makes
the helper an inline function call.
* x64: port vector `fcmp` to ISLE
Fuzz testing identified a lowering case for CLIF's `icmp` in which the
double use of a loaded operand resulted in a register allocation error.
This change manually adds `put_in_xmm` to avoid load-coalescing these
values and includes a CLIF filetest to trigger this issue. Closes#3951.
I opened #3953 to discuss a way in which this kind of mistake (i.e.,
forgetting to add `put_in_*` in certain situations) could be avoided.
This change is refactoring only--it should have no logic changes. As
discussed previously, prefixing all machine code instructions with
`x64_` will make it easier to identify what parts of the ISLE code
correspond to single instructions and what parts rely on helpers that
may emit more than one instruction.
Previously, we used the flags of `AND` for `SETcc`. This change uses
`TEST` instead, which discards the AND result but sets the flags needed
for `SETcc`. This reduces register pressure slightly for this sequence.
* x64: port GPR-held `icmp` to ISLE
* x64: port equality `icmp` for i128 type
* x64: port `icmp` for vector types
* x64: rename from_intcc to intcc_to_cc
In #3849, I moved uextend over to ISLE in the x64 backend. Unfortunately, the lowering patterns had a bug in the i32-to-i64 special case (when we know the generating instruction zeroes the upper 32 bits): it wasn't actually special casing for an i32 source! This meant that e.g. zero extends of the results of i8 adds did not work properly.
This PR fixes the bug and updates the runtest for extends significantly to cover the narrow-value cases.
No security impact to Wasm as Wasm does not use narrow integer types.
Thanks @bjorn3 for reporting!
