20f510671dbaa1c9c41b51f39f6c517461fc08d3
3 Commits
| Author | SHA1 | Message | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Alex Crichton
|
3ed6fae7b3 |
Add trampoline compilation support for lowered imports (#4206)
* Add trampoline compilation support for lowered imports This commit adds support to the component model implementation for compiling trampolines suitable for calling host imports. Currently this is purely just the compilation side of things, modifying the wasmtime-cranelift crate and additionally filling out a new `VMComponentOffsets` type (similar to `VMOffsets`). The actual creation of a `VMComponentContext` is still not performed and will be a subsequent PR. Internally though some tests are actually possible with this where we at least assert that compilation of a component and creation of everything in-memory doesn't panic or trip any assertions, so some tests are added here for that as well. * Fix some test errors |
||
|
Alex Crichton
|
140b83597b |
components: Implement the ability to call component exports (#4039)
* components: Implement the ability to call component exports This commit is an implementation of the typed method of calling component exports. This is intended to represent the most efficient way of calling a component in Wasmtime, similar to what `TypedFunc` represents today for core wasm. Internally this contains all the traits and implementations necessary to invoke component exports with any type signature (e.g. arbitrary parameters and/or results). The expectation is that for results we'll reuse all of this infrastructure except in reverse (arguments and results will be swapped when defining imports). Some features of this implementation are: * Arbitrary type hierarchies are supported * The Rust-standard `Option`, `Result`, `String`, `Vec<T>`, and tuple types all map down to the corresponding type in the component model. * Basic utf-16 string support is implemented as proof-of-concept to show what handling might look like. This will need further testing and benchmarking. * Arguments can be behind "smart pointers", so for example `&Rc<Arc<[u8]>>` corresponds to `list<u8>` in interface types. * Bulk copies from linear memory never happen unless explicitly instructed to do so. The goal of this commit is to create the ability to actually invoke wasm components. This represents what is expected to be the performance threshold for these calls where it ideally should be optimal how WebAssembly is invoked. One major missing piece of this is a `#[derive]` of some sort to generate Rust types for arbitrary `*.wit` types such as custom records, variants, flags, unions, etc. The current trait impls for tuples and `Result<T, E>` are expected to have fleshed out most of what such a derive would look like. There are some downsides and missing pieces to this commit and method of calling components, however, such as: * Passing `&[u8]` to WebAssembly is currently not optimal. Ideally this compiles down to a `memcpy`-equivalent somewhere but that currently doesn't happen due to all the bounds checks of copying data into memory. I have been unsuccessful so far at getting these bounds checks to be removed. * There is no finalization at this time (the "post return" functionality in the canonical ABI). Implementing this should be relatively straightforward but at this time requires `wasmparser` changes to catch up with the current canonical ABI. * There is no guarantee that results of a wasm function will be validated. As results are consumed they are validated but this means that if function returns an invalid string which the host doesn't look at then no trap will be generated. This is probably not the intended semantics of hosts in the component model. * At this time there's no support for memory64 memories, just a bunch of `FIXME`s to get around to. It's expected that this won't be too onerous, however. Some extra care will need to ensure that the various methods related to size/alignment all optimize to the same thing they do today (e.g. constants). * The return value of a typed component function is either `T` or `Value<T>`, and it depends on the ABI details of `T` and whether it takes up more than one return value slot or not. This is an ABI-implementation detail which is being forced through to the API layer which is pretty unfortunate. For example if you say the return value of a function is `(u8, u32)` then it's a runtime type-checking error. I don't know of a great way to solve this at this time. Overall I'm feeling optimistic about this trajectory of implementing value lifting/lowering in Wasmtime. While there are a number of downsides none seem completely insurmountable. There's naturally still a good deal of work with the component model but this should be a significant step up towards implementing and testing the component model. * Review comments * Write tests for calling functions This commit adds a new test file for actually executing functions and testing their results. This is not written as a `*.wast` test yet since it's not 100% clear if that's the best way to do that for now (given that dynamic signatures aren't supported yet). The tests themselves could all largely be translated to `*.wast` testing in the future, though, if supported. Along the way a number of minor issues were fixed with lowerings with the bugs exposed here. * Fix an endian mistake * Fix a typo and the `memory.fill` instruction |
||
|
Alex Crichton
|
fcf6208750 |
Initial skeleton of some component model processing (#4005)
* Initial skeleton of some component model processing This commit is the first of what will likely be many to implement the component model proposal in Wasmtime. This will be structured as a series of incremental commits, most of which haven't been written yet. My hope is to make this incremental and over time to make this easier to review and easier to test each step in isolation. Here much of the skeleton of how components are going to work in Wasmtime is sketched out. This is not a complete implementation of the component model so it's not all that useful yet, but some things you can do are: * Process the type section into a representation amenable for working with in Wasmtime. * Process the module section and register core wasm modules. * Process the instance section for core wasm modules. * Process core wasm module imports. * Process core wasm instance aliasing. * Ability to compile a component with core wasm embedded. * Ability to instantiate a component with no imports. * Ability to get functions from this component. This is already starting to diverge from the previous module linking representation where a `Component` will try to avoid unnecessary metadata about the component and instead internally only have the bare minimum necessary to instantiate the module. My hope is we can avoid constructing most of the index spaces during instantiation only for it to all ge thrown away. Additionally I'm predicting that we'll need to see through processing where possible to know how to generate adapters and where they are fused. At this time you can't actually call a component's functions, and that's the next PR that I would like to make. * Add tests for the component model support This commit uses the recently updated wasm-tools crates to add tests for the component model added in the previous commit. This involved updating the `wasmtime-wast` crate for component-model changes. Currently the component support there is quite primitive, but enough to at least instantiate components and verify the internals of Wasmtime are all working correctly. Additionally some simple tests for the embedding API have also been added. |