This adds support for the `table.copy` instruction from the bulk memory
proposal. It also supports multiple tables, which were introduced by the
reference types proposal.
Part of #928
* Reel in unsafety around `InstanceHandle`
This commit is an attempt, or at least is targeted at being a start, at
reeling in the unsafety around the `InstanceHandle` type. Currently this
type represents a sort of moral `Rc<Instance>` but is a bit more
specialized since the underlying memory is allocated through mmap.
Additionally, though, `InstanceHandle` exposes a fundamental flaw in its
safety by safetly allowing mutable access so long as you have `&mut
InstanceHandle`. This type, however, is trivially created by simply
cloning a `InstanceHandle` to get an owned reference. This means that
`&mut InstanceHandle` does not actually provide any guarantees about
uniqueness, so there's no more safety than `&InstanceHandle` itself.
This commit removes all `&mut self` APIs from `InstanceHandle`,
additionally removing some where `&self` was `unsafe` and `&mut self`
was safe (since it was trivial to subvert this "safety"). In doing so
interior mutability patterns are now used much more extensively through
structures such as `Table` and `Memory`. Additionally a number of
methods were refactored to be a bit clearer and use helper functions
where possible.
This is a relatively large commit unfortunately, but it snowballed very
quickly into touching quite a few places. My hope though is that this
will prevent developers working on wasmtime internals as well as
developers still yet to migrate to the `wasmtime` crate from falling
into trivial unsafe traps by accidentally using `&mut` when they can't.
All existing users relying on `&mut` will need to migrate to some form
of interior mutability, such as using `RefCell` or `Cell`.
This commit also additionally marks `InstanceHandle::new` as an `unsafe`
function. The rationale for this is that the `&mut`-safety is only the
beginning for the safety of `InstanceHandle`. In general the wasmtime
internals are extremely unsafe and haven't been audited for appropriate
usage of `unsafe`. Until that's done it's hoped that we can warn users
with this `unsafe` constructor and otherwise push users to the
`wasmtime` crate which we know is safe.
* Fix windows build
* Wrap up mutable memory state in one structure
Rather than having separate fields
* Use `Cell::set`, not `Cell::replace`, where possible
* Add a helper function for offsets from VMContext
* Fix a typo from merging
* rustfmt
* Use try_from, not as
* Tweak style of some setters
* Migrate back to `std::` stylistically
This commit moves away from idioms such as `alloc::` and `core::` as
imports of standard data structures and types. Instead it migrates all
crates to uniformly use `std::` for importing standard data structures
and types. This also removes the `std` and `core` features from all
crates to and removes any conditional checking for `feature = "std"`
All of this support was previously added in #407 in an effort to make
wasmtime/cranelift "`no_std` compatible". Unfortunately though this
change comes at a cost:
* The usage of `alloc` and `core` isn't idiomatic. Especially trying to
dual between types like `HashMap` from `std` as well as from
`hashbrown` causes imports to be surprising in some cases.
* Unfortunately there was no CI check that crates were `no_std`, so none
of them actually were. Many crates still imported from `std` or
depended on crates that used `std`.
It's important to note, however, that **this does not mean that wasmtime
will not run in embedded environments**. The style of the code today and
idioms aren't ready in Rust to support this degree of multiplexing and
makes it somewhat difficult to keep up with the style of `wasmtime`.
Instead it's intended that embedded runtime support will be added as
necessary. Currently only `std` is necessary to build `wasmtime`, and
platforms that natively need to execute `wasmtime` will need to use a
Rust target that supports `std`. Note though that not all of `std` needs
to be supported, but instead much of it could be configured off to
return errors, and `wasmtime` would be configured to gracefully handle
errors.
The goal of this PR is to move `wasmtime` back to idiomatic usage of
features/`std`/imports/etc and help development in the short-term.
Long-term when platform concerns arise (if any) they can be addressed by
moving back to `no_std` crates (but fixing the issues mentioned above)
or ensuring that the target in Rust has `std` available.
* Start filling out platform support doc
