* x64: port GPR-held `icmp` to ISLE
* x64: port equality `icmp` for i128 type
* x64: port `icmp` for vector types
* x64: rename from_intcc to intcc_to_cc
The `fpcmp` helper in the x64 backend uses `put_in_xmm_mem` for one of
its operands, which allows the compiler to merge a load with the compare
instruction (`ucomiss` or `ucomisd`).
Unfortunately, as we saw in #2576 for the integer-compare case, this
does not work with our lowering algorithm because compares can be
lowered more than once (unlike all other instructions) to reproduce the
flags where needed. Merging a load into an op that executes more than
once is invalid in general (the two loads may observe different values,
which violates the original program semantics because there was only one
load originally).
This does not result in a miscompilation, but instead will cause a panic
at regalloc time because the register that should have been defined by
the separate load is never written (the load is never emitted
separately).
I think this (very subtle, easy to miss) condition was unfortunately not
ported over when we moved the logic in #3682.
The existing fcmp-of-load test in `cmp-mem-bug` (from #2576) does not
seem to trigger it, for a reason I haven't fully deduced. I just added
the verbatim function body (happens to come from `clang.wasm`) that
triggers the bug as a test.
Discovered while bringing up regalloc2 support. It's pretty unlikely to
hit by chance, which is why I think none of our fuzzing has hit it yet.
Previously (as in an hour ago) #3905 landed a new ability for fuzzing to
arbitrarily insert padding between functions. Running some fuzzers
locally though this instantly hit a lot of problems on AArch64 because
the arbitrary padding isn't aligned to 4 bytes like all other functions
are. To fix this issue appending functions now correctly aligns the
output as appropriate for the platform. The alignment argument for
appending was switched to `None` where `None` means "use the platform
default" and otherwise and explicit alignment can be specified for
inserting other data (like arbitrary padding or Windows unwind tables).
In #3849, I moved uextend over to ISLE in the x64 backend. Unfortunately, the lowering patterns had a bug in the i32-to-i64 special case (when we know the generating instruction zeroes the upper 32 bits): it wasn't actually special casing for an i32 source! This meant that e.g. zero extends of the results of i8 adds did not work properly.
This PR fixes the bug and updates the runtest for extends significantly to cover the narrow-value cases.
No security impact to Wasm as Wasm does not use narrow integer types.
Thanks @bjorn3 for reporting!
The current definition of `ValueSlice` is not usable, since any call to
a constructor returning a `ValueSlice` will extend the mutable borrow
on the context taken by the constructor call, with the result that it
cannot be passed to any other constructor ever.
Re-implement `ValueSlice` as a pair of a `ValueList` identifer plus an
offset into the list. This type can simply be copied without requiring
a borrow on the context.
This changes the output of the `lower` constructor from a
`ValueRegs` to a new `InstOutput` type, which is a vector
of `ValueRegs`.
Code in `lower_common` is updated to use this new type to
handle instructions with multiple outputs. All back-ends
are updated to use the new type.
This PR makes use of the new implicit-conversion feature of the ISLE DSL
that was introduced in #3807 in order to make the lowering rules
significantly simpler and more concise.
The basic idea is to eliminate the repetitive and mechanical use of
terms that convert from one type to another when there is only one real
way to do the conversion -- for example, to go from a `WritableReg` to a
`Reg`, the only sensible way is to use `writable_reg_to_reg`.
This PR generally takes any term of the form "A_to_B" and makes it an
automatic conversion, as well as some others that are similar in spirit.
The notable exception to the pure-value-convsion category is the
`put_in_reg` family of operations, which actually do have side-effects.
However, as noted in the doc additions in #3807, this is fine as long as
the side-effects are idempotent. And on balance, making `put_in_reg`
automatic is a significant clarity win -- together with other operand
converters, it enables rules like:
```
;; Add two registers.
(rule (lower (has_type (fits_in_64 ty)
(iadd x y)))
(add ty x y))
```
There may be other converters that we could define to make the rules
even simpler; we can make such improvements as we think of them, but
this should be a good start!
* x64: port `select` using an FP comparison to ISLE
This change includes quite a few interlocking parts, required mainly by
the current x64 conventions in ISLE:
- it adds a way to emit a `cmove` with multiple OR-ing conditions;
because x64 ISLE cannot currently safely emit a comparison followed
by several jumps, this adds `MachInst::CmoveOr` and
`MachInst::XmmCmoveOr` macro instructions. Unfortunately, these macro
instructions hide the multi-instruction sequence in `lower.isle`
- to properly keep track of what instructions consume and produce
flags, @cfallin added a way to pass around variants of
`ConsumesFlags` and `ProducesFlags`--these changes affect all
backends
- then, to lower the `fcmp + select` CLIF, this change adds several
`cmove*_from_values` helpers that perform all of the awkward
conversions between `Value`, `ValueReg`, `Reg`, and `Gpr/Xmm`; one
upside is that now these lowerings have much-improved documentation
explaining why the various `FloatCC` and `CC` choices are made the
the way they are.
Co-authored-by: Chris Fallin <chris@cfallin.org>
* Enable SSE 4.2 unconditionally
Fuzzing over the weekend found that `i64x2` comparison operators
require `pcmpgtq` which is an SSE 4.2 instruction. Along the lines of #3816
this commit unconditionally enables and requires SSE 4.2 for compilation
and fuzzing. It will no longer be possible to create a compiler for
x86_64 with simd enabled if SSE 4.2 is disabled.
* Update comment
Combine the two opcodes into one and pass and add an OperandSize
field to these instructions, as well as an ISLE helper to perform
the conversion from Type.
This saves us from having having to write ISLE helpers to select the
correct opcode, based on type, and reduces the amount of code needed
for emission.
Copyright (c) 2022, Arm Limited.
Addresses #3809: when we are asked to create a Cranelift backend with
shared flags that indicate support for SIMD, we should check that the
ISA level needed for our SIMD lowerings is present.
In #3721, we have been discussing what to do about the ARM32 backend in
Cranelift. Currently, this backend supports only 32-bit types, which is
insufficient for full Wasm-MVP; it's missing other critical bits, like
floating-point support; and it has only ever been exercised, AFAIK, via
the filetests for the individual CLIF instructions that are implemented.
We were very very thankful for the original contribution of this
backend, even in its partial state, and we had hoped at the time that we
could eventually mature it in-tree until it supported e.g. Wasm and
other use-cases. But that hasn't yet happened -- to the blame of no-one,
to be clear, we just haven't had a contributor with sufficient time.
Unfortunately, the existence of the backend and lack of active
maintainer now potentially pose a bit of a burden as we hope to make
continuing changes to the backend framework. For example, the ISLE
migration, and the use of regalloc2 that it will allow, would need all
of the existing lowering patterns in the hand-written ARM32 backend to
be rewritten as ISLE rules.
Given that we don't currently have the resources to do this, we think
it's probably best if we, sadly, for now remove this partial backend.
This is not in any way a statement of what we might accept in the
future, though. If, in the future, an ARM32 backend updated to our
latest codebase with an active maintainer were to appear, we'd be happy
to merge it (and likewise for any other architecture!). But for now,
this is probably the best path. Thanks again to the original contributor
@jmkrauz and we hope that this work can eventually be brought back and
reused if someone has the time to do so!
We already defined the `Gpr` newtype and used it in a few places, and we already
defined the `Xmm` newtype and used it extensively. This finishes the transition
to using the newtypes extensively in lowering by making use of `Gpr` in more
places.
Fixes#3685
Add accessors to prelude.isle to access data fields of
`func_addr` and `symbol_value` instructions.
These are based on similar versions I had added to the s390x
back-end, but are a bit more straightforward to use.
- func_ref_data: Extract SigRef, ExternalName, and RelocDistance
fields given a FuncRef.
- symbol_value_data: Extract ExternalName, RelocDistance, and
offset fields given a GlobalValue representing a Symbol.
- reloc_distance_near: Test for RelocDistance::Near.
The s390x back-end is changed to use these common versions.
Note that this exposed a bug in common isle code: This extractor:
(extractor (load_sym inst)
(and inst
(load _ (def_inst (symbol_value
(symbol_value_data _
(reloc_distance_near) offset)))
(i64_from_offset
(memarg_symbol_offset_sum <offset _)))))
would raise an assertion in sema.rs due to a supposed cycle in
extractor definitions. But there was no actual cycle, it was
simply that the extractor tree refers twice to the `insn_data`
extractor (once via the `load` and once via the `symbol_value`
extractor). Fixed by checking for pre-existing definitions only
along one path in the tree, not across the whole tree.
This adds support for all atomic operations that were unimplemented
so far in the s390x back end:
- atomic_rmw operations xchg, nand, smin, smax, umin, umax
- $I8 and $I16 versions of atomic_rmw and atomic_cas
- little endian versions of atomic_rmw and atomic_cas
All of these have to be implemented by a compare-and-swap loop;
and for the $I8 and $I16 versions the actual atomic instruction
needs to operate on the surrounding aligned 32-bit word.
Since we cannot emit new control flow during ISLE instruction
selection, these compare-and-swap loops are emitted as a single
meta-instruction to be expanded at emit time.
However, since there is a large number of different versions of
the loop required to implement all the above operations, I've
implemented a facility to allow specifying the loop bodies
from within ISLE after all, by creating a vector of MInst
structures that will be emitted as part of the meta-instruction.
There are still restrictions, in particular instructions that
are part of the loop body may not modify any virtual register.
But even so, this approach looks preferable to doing everything
in emit.rs.
A few instructions needed in those compare-and-swap loop bodies
were added as well, in particular the RxSBG family of instructions
as well as the LOAD REVERSED in-register byte-swap instructions.
This patch also adds filetest runtests to verify the semantics
of all operations, in particular the subword and little-endian
variants (those are currently only executed on s390x).
The debuginfo analyses are written with the assumption that the order of
instructions in the VCode is the order of instructions in the final
machine ocde. This was previously a strong invariant, until we
introduced support for cold blocks. Cold blocks are implemented by
reordering during emission, because the VCode ordering has other
requirements related to lowering (respecting def-use dependencies in the
reverse pass), so it is much simpler to reorder instructions at the last
moment. Unfortunately, this causes the breakage we now see.
This commit fixes the issue by skipping all cold instructions when
emitting value-label ranges (which are translated into debuginfo). This
means that variables defined in cold blocks will not have DWARF
metadata. But cold blocks are usually compiler-inserted slowpaths, not
user code, so this is probably OK. Debuginfo is always best-effort, so
in any case this does not violate any correctness constraints.
This primary motivation of this large commit (apologies for its size!) is to
introduce `Gpr` and `Xmm` newtypes over `Reg`. This should help catch
difficult-to-diagnose register class mixup bugs in x64 lowerings.
But having a newtype for `Gpr` and `Xmm` themselves isn't enough to catch all of
our operand-with-wrong-register-class bugs, because about 50% of operands on x64
aren't just a register, but a register or memory address or even an
immediate! So we have `{Gpr,Xmm}Mem[Imm]` newtypes as well.
Unfortunately, `GprMem` et al can't be `enum`s and are therefore a little bit
noisier to work with from ISLE. They need to maintain the invariant that their
registers really are of the claimed register class, so they need to encapsulate
the inner data. If they exposed the underlying `enum` variants, then anyone
could just change register classes or construct a `GprMem` that holds an XMM
register, defeating the whole point of these newtypes. So when working with
these newtypes from ISLE, we rely on external constructors like `(gpr_to_gpr_mem
my_gpr)` instead of `(GprMem.Gpr my_gpr)`.
A bit of extra lines of code are included to add support for register mapping
for all of these newtypes as well. Ultimately this is all a bit wordier than I'd
hoped it would be when I first started authoring this commit, but I think it is
all worth it nonetheless!
In the process of adding these newtypes, I didn't want to have to update both
the ISLE `extern` type definition of `MInst` and the Rust definition, so I move
the definition fully into ISLE, similar as aarch64.
Finally, this process isn't complete. I've introduced the newtypes here, and
I've made most XMM-using instructions switch from `Reg` to `Xmm`, as well as
register class-converting instructions, but I haven't moved all of the GPR-using
instructions over to the newtypes yet. I figured this commit was big enough as
it was, and I can continue the adoption of these newtypes in follow up commits.
Part of #3685.
Even though the implementation of emit and emit_safepoint may
be platform-specific, the interface ought to be common so that
other code in prelude.isle may safely call these constructors.
This patch moves the definition of emit (from all platforms)
and emit_safepoint (s390x only) to prelude.isle. This required
adding an emit_safepoint implementation to aarch64 and x64 as
well - the latter is still a stub as special move mitosis
handling will be required.
In order to migrate branches to ISLE, we define a second entry
point `lower_branch` which gets the list of branch targets as
additional argument.
This requires a small change to `lower_common`: the `isle_lower`
callback argument is changed from a function pointer to a closure.
This allows passing the extra argument via a closure.
Traps make use of the recently added facility to emit safepoints
from ISLE, but are otherwise straightforward.
Change the implementation of emitted_insts in IsleContext from
a plain vector of instructions into a vector of tuples, where
the second element is a boolean that indicates whether this
instruction should be emitted as a safepoint.
This allows targets to emit safepoint insns via ISLE.
Attempt to match a Jump instruction in ISLE will currently lead to the
generated files not compiling. This is because the definition of the
InstructionData enum in clif.isle does not match the actual type used
in Rust code.
Specifically, clif.isle erroneously omits the ValueList variable-length
argument entry if the format does not use a typevar operand. This is
the case for Jump and a few other formats. The problem is caused by
a bug in the gen_isle routine in meta/src/gen_inst.rs.
The BranchTarget abstraction is no longer needed, since all branches are
being emitted using a MachLabel target. Remove BranchTarget and simply
use MachLabel everywhere a branch target is required. (This brings the
s390x back-end in line with what x64 does as well.)
In addition, simplify jumptable emission by moving all instructions
that do not depend on the internal label (i.e. the conditional branch
to the default label, as well as the scaling the index register) out of
the combined JTSequence instruction.
This refactoring will make moving branch generation to ISLE easier.
If a block is marked cold but has side-effect-free code that is only
used by side-effectful code in non-cold blocks, we will erroneously fail
to emit it, causing a regalloc failure.
This is due to the interaction of block ordering and lowering: we rely
on block ordering to visit uses before defs (except for backedges) so
that we can effectively do an inline liveness analysis and skip lowering
operations that are not used anywhere. This "inline DCE" is needed
because instruction lowering can pattern-match and merge one instruction
into another, removing the need to generate the source instruction.
Unfortunately, the way that I added cold-block support in #3698 was
oblivious to this -- it just changed the block sort order. For
efficiency reasons, we generate code in its final order directly, so it
would not be tenable to generate it in e.g. RPO first and then reorder
cold blocks to the bottom; we really do want to visit in the same order
as the final code.
This PR fixes the bug by moving the point at which cold blocks are sunk
to emission-time instead. This is cheaper than either trying to visit
blocks during lowering in RPO but add to VCode out-of-order, or trying
to do some expensive analysis to recover proper liveness. It's not clear
that the latter would be possible anyway -- the need to lower some
instructions depends on other instructions' isel results/merging
success, so we really do need to visit in RPO, and we can't simply lower
all instructions as side-effecting roots (some can't be toplevel nodes).
The one downside of this approach is that the VCode itself still has
cold blocks inline; so in the text format (and hence compile-tests) it's
not possible to see the sinking. This PR adds a test for cold-block
sinking that actually verifies the machine code. (The test also includes
an add-instruction in the cold path that would have been incorrectly
skipped prior to this fix.)
Fortunately this bug would not have been triggered by the one current
use of cold blocks in #3699, because there the only operation in the
cold block was an (always effectful) call instruction. The worst-case
effect of the bug in other code would be a regalloc panic; no silent
miscompilations could result.
This adds ISLE support for the s390x back-end and moves lowering
of most instructions to ISLE. The only instructions still remaining
are calls, returns, traps, and branches, most of which will need
additional support in common code.
Generated code is not intended to be (significantly) different
than before; any additional optimizations now made easier to
implement due to the ISLE layer can be added in follow-on patches.
There were a few differences in some filetests, but those are all
just simple register allocation changes (and all to the better!).
This commit adds support for denoting cold blocks in the CLIF text
format as follows:
```plain
function %f() {
block0(...):
...
block1 cold:
...
block2(...) cold:
...
block3:
...
```
With this syntax, we are able to see the cold-block flag in CLIF, we can
write tests using it, and it is preserved when round-tripping.
Fixes#3701.
In preparing to move the s390x back-end to ISLE, I noticed a few
missing pieces in the common prelude code. This patch:
- Defines the reference types $R32 / $R64.
- Provides a trap_code_bad_conversion_to_integer helper.
- Provides an avoid_div_traps helper. This requires passing the
generic flags in addition to the ISA-specifc flags into the
ISLE lowering context.
In preparing the back-end to move to ISLE, I detected a
number of codegen bugs in the existing code, which are
fixed here:
- Fix internal compiler error with uload16/icmp corner case.
- Fix broken Cls lowering.
- Correctly mask shift count for i8/i16 shifts.
In addition, I made several changes to operand encodings
in various MInst patterns. These should not have any
functional effect, but will make the ISLE migration easier:
- Encode floating-point constants as u32/u64 in MInst patterns.
- Encode shift amounts as u8 and Reg in ShiftOp pattern.
- Use MemArg in LoadMultiple64 and StoreMultiple64 patterns.
This PR adds a flag to each block that can be set via the frontend/builder
interface that indicates that the block will not be frequently
executed. As such, the compiler backend should place the block "out of
line" in the final machine code, so that the ordinary, more frequent
execution path that excludes the block does not have to jump around it.
This is useful for adding handlers for exceptional conditions
(slow-paths, guard violations) in a way that minimizes performance cost.
Fixes#2747.
