AArch64: Add various missing SIMD bits

In addition, improve the code for stack pointer manipulation.

Copyright (c) 2020, Arm Limited.
This commit is contained in:
Anton Kirilov
2020-09-07 13:01:47 +01:00
parent 074a0afa83
commit f612e8e7b2
7 changed files with 59 additions and 62 deletions

View File

@@ -497,7 +497,6 @@ impl MachInstEmit for Inst {
ALUOp::AddS64 => 0b10101011_000,
ALUOp::SubS32 => 0b01101011_000,
ALUOp::SubS64 => 0b11101011_000,
ALUOp::SubS64XR => 0b11101011_001,
ALUOp::SDiv64 => 0b10011010_110,
ALUOp::UDiv64 => 0b10011010_110,
ALUOp::RotR32 | ALUOp::Lsr32 | ALUOp::Asr32 | ALUOp::Lsl32 => 0b00011010_110,
@@ -512,17 +511,13 @@ impl MachInstEmit for Inst {
ALUOp::Lsr32 | ALUOp::Lsr64 => 0b001001,
ALUOp::Asr32 | ALUOp::Asr64 => 0b001010,
ALUOp::Lsl32 | ALUOp::Lsl64 => 0b001000,
ALUOp::SubS64XR => 0b011000,
ALUOp::SMulH | ALUOp::UMulH => 0b011111,
_ => 0b000000,
};
debug_assert_ne!(writable_stack_reg(), rd);
// The stack pointer is the zero register if this instruction
// doesn't have access to extended registers, so this might be
// an indication that something is wrong.
if alu_op != ALUOp::SubS64XR {
debug_assert_ne!(stack_reg(), rn);
}
// The stack pointer is the zero register in this context, so this might be an
// indication that something is wrong.
debug_assert_ne!(stack_reg(), rn);
debug_assert_ne!(stack_reg(), rm);
sink.put4(enc_arith_rrr(top11, bit15_10, rd, rn, rm));
}
@@ -2079,19 +2074,6 @@ impl MachInstEmit for Inst {
// disable the worst-case-size check in this case.
start_off = sink.cur_offset();
}
&Inst::LoadConst64 { rd, const_data } => {
let inst = Inst::ULoad64 {
rd,
mem: AMode::Label(MemLabel::PCRel(8)),
srcloc: None, // can't cause a user trap.
};
inst.emit(sink, flags, state);
let inst = Inst::Jump {
dest: BranchTarget::ResolvedOffset(12),
};
inst.emit(sink, flags, state);
sink.put8(const_data);
}
&Inst::LoadExtName {
rd,
ref name,