Fix Invalid Instruction format in fuzzgen (#4738)
* cranelift: Add assert to prevent wrong InstFormat being used for the wrong opcode * cranelift: Use correct instruction format when inserting opcodes in fuzzgen (fixes #4733) * cranelift: Use debug assert on InstFormat assert
This commit is contained in:
@@ -902,6 +902,9 @@ fn gen_format_constructor(format: &InstructionFormat, fmt: &mut Formatter) {
|
||||
fmtln!(fmt, "data.sign_extend_immediates(ctrl_typevar);");
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Assert that this opcode belongs to this format
|
||||
fmtln!(fmt, "debug_assert_eq!(opcode.format(), InstructionFormat::from(&data), \"Wrong InstructionFormat for Opcode: {}\", opcode);");
|
||||
|
||||
fmt.line("self.build(data, ctrl_typevar)");
|
||||
});
|
||||
fmtln!(fmt, "}");
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -4,6 +4,7 @@
|
||||
//! function. Many of its methods are generated from the meta language instruction definitions.
|
||||
|
||||
use crate::ir;
|
||||
use crate::ir::instructions::InstructionFormat;
|
||||
use crate::ir::types;
|
||||
use crate::ir::{DataFlowGraph, InstructionData};
|
||||
use crate::ir::{Inst, Opcode, Type, Value};
|
||||
@@ -217,7 +218,7 @@ mod tests {
|
||||
use crate::cursor::{Cursor, FuncCursor};
|
||||
use crate::ir::condcodes::*;
|
||||
use crate::ir::types::*;
|
||||
use crate::ir::{Function, InstBuilder, ValueDef};
|
||||
use crate::ir::{Function, InstBuilder, Opcode, TrapCode, ValueDef};
|
||||
|
||||
#[test]
|
||||
fn types() {
|
||||
@@ -262,4 +263,17 @@ mod tests {
|
||||
assert!(iadd != iconst);
|
||||
assert_eq!(pos.func.dfg.value_def(v0), ValueDef::Result(iconst, 0));
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#[test]
|
||||
#[should_panic]
|
||||
fn panics_when_inserting_wrong_opcode() {
|
||||
let mut func = Function::new();
|
||||
let block0 = func.dfg.make_block();
|
||||
let mut pos = FuncCursor::new(&mut func);
|
||||
pos.insert_block(block0);
|
||||
|
||||
// We are trying to create a Opcode::Return with the InstData::Trap, which is obviously wrong
|
||||
pos.ins()
|
||||
.Trap(Opcode::Return, I32, TrapCode::BadConversionToInteger);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -1,7 +1,8 @@
|
||||
use crate::codegen::ir::{ArgumentExtension, ArgumentPurpose, ValueList};
|
||||
use crate::codegen::ir::{ArgumentExtension, ArgumentPurpose};
|
||||
use crate::config::Config;
|
||||
use anyhow::Result;
|
||||
use arbitrary::{Arbitrary, Unstructured};
|
||||
use cranelift::codegen::ir::instructions::InstructionFormat;
|
||||
use cranelift::codegen::ir::{types::*, FuncRef, LibCall, UserExternalName, UserFuncName};
|
||||
use cranelift::codegen::ir::{
|
||||
AbiParam, Block, ExternalName, Function, JumpTable, Opcode, Signature, StackSlot, Type, Value,
|
||||
@@ -24,11 +25,11 @@ fn insert_opcode(
|
||||
args: &'static [Type],
|
||||
rets: &'static [Type],
|
||||
) -> Result<()> {
|
||||
let mut arg_vals = ValueList::new();
|
||||
let mut vals = Vec::with_capacity(args.len());
|
||||
for &arg in args.into_iter() {
|
||||
let var = fgen.get_variable_of_type(arg)?;
|
||||
let val = builder.use_var(var);
|
||||
arg_vals.push(val, &mut builder.func.dfg.value_lists);
|
||||
vals.push(val);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// For pretty much every instruction the control type is the return type
|
||||
@@ -42,7 +43,16 @@ fn insert_opcode(
|
||||
.copied()
|
||||
.unwrap_or(INVALID);
|
||||
|
||||
let (inst, dfg) = builder.ins().MultiAry(opcode, ctrl_type, arg_vals);
|
||||
// Choose the appropriate instruction format for this opcode
|
||||
let (inst, dfg) = match opcode.format() {
|
||||
InstructionFormat::NullAry => builder.ins().NullAry(opcode, ctrl_type),
|
||||
InstructionFormat::Unary => builder.ins().Unary(opcode, ctrl_type, vals[0]),
|
||||
InstructionFormat::Binary => builder.ins().Binary(opcode, ctrl_type, vals[0], vals[1]),
|
||||
InstructionFormat::Ternary => builder
|
||||
.ins()
|
||||
.Ternary(opcode, ctrl_type, vals[0], vals[1], vals[2]),
|
||||
_ => unimplemented!(),
|
||||
};
|
||||
let results = dfg.inst_results(inst).to_vec();
|
||||
|
||||
for (val, &ty) in results.into_iter().zip(rets) {
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user