Infallible extractors, and some fixes to fallibility in return types (Option<T> vs T).
This commit is contained in:
@@ -1,8 +1,10 @@
|
||||
- Optimizations
|
||||
- Infallible patterns; optimize away control flow when possible.
|
||||
- Don't do the closure-wrapping thing for expressions inside of patterns.
|
||||
- Document the semantics of the DSL!
|
||||
|
||||
- Document semantics carefully, especially wrt extractors.
|
||||
- Clean up and factor the codegen properly.
|
||||
|
||||
- Build out an initial set of bindings for Cranelift LowerCtx with extractors
|
||||
for instruction info.
|
||||
- Look into whether optimizations are possible:
|
||||
- More in-depth fallibility analysis (avoid failure edges where possible)
|
||||
|
||||
- Slightly nicer human-readable generated code
|
||||
- Include full rule body (S-expression) in comment, not just line number
|
||||
- Inline some expressions (no more `let val23 = 1234; ... f(val23);`)
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user