Mass rename Ebb and relatives to Block (#1365)
* Manually rename BasicBlock to BlockPredecessor BasicBlock is a pair of (Ebb, Inst) that is used to represent the basic block subcomponent of an Ebb that is a predecessor to an Ebb. Eventually we will be able to remove this struct, but for now it makes sense to give it a non-conflicting name so that we can start to transition Ebb to represent a basic block. I have not updated any comments that refer to BasicBlock, as eventually we will remove BlockPredecessor and replace with Block, which is a basic block, so the comments will become correct. * Manually rename SSABuilder block types to avoid conflict SSABuilder has its own Block and BlockData types. These along with associated identifier will cause conflicts in a later commit, so they are renamed to be more verbose here. * Automatically rename 'Ebb' to 'Block' in *.rs * Automatically rename 'EBB' to 'block' in *.rs * Automatically rename 'ebb' to 'block' in *.rs * Automatically rename 'extended basic block' to 'basic block' in *.rs * Automatically rename 'an basic block' to 'a basic block' in *.rs * Manually update comment for `Block` `Block`'s wikipedia article required an update. * Automatically rename 'an `Block`' to 'a `Block`' in *.rs * Automatically rename 'extended_basic_block' to 'basic_block' in *.rs * Automatically rename 'ebb' to 'block' in *.clif * Manually rename clif constant that contains 'ebb' as substring to avoid conflict * Automatically rename filecheck uses of 'EBB' to 'BB' 'regex: EBB' -> 'regex: BB' '$EBB' -> '$BB' * Automatically rename 'EBB' 'Ebb' to 'block' in *.clif * Automatically rename 'an block' to 'a block' in *.clif * Fix broken testcase when function name length increases Test function names are limited to 16 characters. This causes the new longer name to be truncated and fail a filecheck test. An outdated comment was also fixed.
This commit is contained in:
@@ -44,7 +44,7 @@ impl ConstImm {
|
||||
pub fn fold_constants(func: &mut ir::Function) {
|
||||
let mut pos = FuncCursor::new(func);
|
||||
|
||||
while let Some(_ebb) = pos.next_ebb() {
|
||||
while let Some(_block) = pos.next_block() {
|
||||
while let Some(inst) = pos.next_inst() {
|
||||
use self::ir::InstructionData::*;
|
||||
match pos.func.dfg[inst] {
|
||||
@@ -225,7 +225,7 @@ fn fold_unary(dfg: &mut ir::DataFlowGraph, inst: ir::Inst, opcode: ir::Opcode, a
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
fn fold_branch(pos: &mut FuncCursor, inst: ir::Inst, opcode: ir::Opcode) {
|
||||
let (cond, ebb, args) = {
|
||||
let (cond, block, args) = {
|
||||
let values = pos.func.dfg.inst_args(inst);
|
||||
let inst_data = &pos.func.dfg[inst];
|
||||
(
|
||||
@@ -246,8 +246,8 @@ fn fold_branch(pos: &mut FuncCursor, inst: ir::Inst, opcode: ir::Opcode) {
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
if (branch_if_zero && !truthiness) || (!branch_if_zero && truthiness) {
|
||||
pos.func.dfg.replace(inst).jump(ebb, &args);
|
||||
// remove the rest of the ebb to avoid verifier errors
|
||||
pos.func.dfg.replace(inst).jump(block, &args);
|
||||
// remove the rest of the block to avoid verifier errors
|
||||
while let Some(next_inst) = pos.func.layout.next_inst(inst) {
|
||||
pos.func.layout.remove_inst(next_inst);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user