Mass rename Ebb and relatives to Block (#1365)

* Manually rename BasicBlock to BlockPredecessor

BasicBlock is a pair of (Ebb, Inst) that is used to represent the
basic block subcomponent of an Ebb that is a predecessor to an Ebb.

Eventually we will be able to remove this struct, but for now it
makes sense to give it a non-conflicting name so that we can start
to transition Ebb to represent a basic block.

I have not updated any comments that refer to BasicBlock, as
eventually we will remove BlockPredecessor and replace with Block,
which is a basic block, so the comments will become correct.

* Manually rename SSABuilder block types to avoid conflict

SSABuilder has its own Block and BlockData types. These along with
associated identifier will cause conflicts in a later commit, so
they are renamed to be more verbose here.

* Automatically rename 'Ebb' to 'Block' in *.rs

* Automatically rename 'EBB' to 'block' in *.rs

* Automatically rename 'ebb' to 'block' in *.rs

* Automatically rename 'extended basic block' to 'basic block' in *.rs

* Automatically rename 'an basic block' to 'a basic block' in *.rs

* Manually update comment for `Block`

`Block`'s wikipedia article required an update.

* Automatically rename 'an `Block`' to 'a `Block`' in *.rs

* Automatically rename 'extended_basic_block' to 'basic_block' in *.rs

* Automatically rename 'ebb' to 'block' in *.clif

* Manually rename clif constant that contains 'ebb' as substring to avoid conflict

* Automatically rename filecheck uses of 'EBB' to 'BB'

'regex: EBB' -> 'regex: BB'
'$EBB' -> '$BB'

* Automatically rename 'EBB' 'Ebb' to 'block' in *.clif

* Automatically rename 'an block' to 'a block' in *.clif

* Fix broken testcase when function name length increases

Test function names are limited to 16 characters. This causes
the new longer name to be truncated and fail a filecheck test. An
outdated comment was also fixed.
This commit is contained in:
Ryan Hunt
2020-02-07 10:46:47 -06:00
committed by GitHub
parent a136d1cb00
commit 832666c45e
370 changed files with 8090 additions and 7988 deletions

View File

@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
//! Verify CPU flags values.
use crate::entity::{EntitySet, SecondaryMap};
use crate::flowgraph::{BasicBlock, ControlFlowGraph};
use crate::flowgraph::{BlockPredecessor, ControlFlowGraph};
use crate::ir;
use crate::ir::instructions::BranchInfo;
use crate::isa;
@@ -42,33 +42,33 @@ struct FlagsVerifier<'a> {
cfg: &'a ControlFlowGraph,
encinfo: Option<isa::EncInfo>,
/// The single live-in flags value (if any) for each EBB.
livein: SecondaryMap<ir::Ebb, PackedOption<ir::Value>>,
/// The single live-in flags value (if any) for each block.
livein: SecondaryMap<ir::Block, PackedOption<ir::Value>>,
}
impl<'a> FlagsVerifier<'a> {
fn check(&mut self, errors: &mut VerifierErrors) -> VerifierStepResult<()> {
// List of EBBs that need to be processed. EBBs may be re-added to this list when we detect
// List of blocks that need to be processed. blocks may be re-added to this list when we detect
// that one of their successor blocks needs a live-in flags value.
let mut worklist = EntitySet::with_capacity(self.func.layout.ebb_capacity());
for ebb in self.func.layout.ebbs() {
worklist.insert(ebb);
let mut worklist = EntitySet::with_capacity(self.func.layout.block_capacity());
for block in self.func.layout.blocks() {
worklist.insert(block);
}
while let Some(ebb) = worklist.pop() {
if let Some(value) = self.visit_ebb(ebb, errors)? {
// The EBB has live-in flags. Check if the value changed.
match self.livein[ebb].expand() {
// Revisit any predecessor blocks the first time we see a live-in for `ebb`.
while let Some(block) = worklist.pop() {
if let Some(value) = self.visit_block(block, errors)? {
// The block has live-in flags. Check if the value changed.
match self.livein[block].expand() {
// Revisit any predecessor blocks the first time we see a live-in for `block`.
None => {
self.livein[ebb] = value.into();
for BasicBlock { ebb: pred, .. } in self.cfg.pred_iter(ebb) {
self.livein[block] = value.into();
for BlockPredecessor { block: pred, .. } in self.cfg.pred_iter(block) {
worklist.insert(pred);
}
}
Some(old) if old != value => {
return errors.fatal((
ebb,
block,
format!("conflicting live-in CPU flags: {} and {}", old, value),
));
}
@@ -76,24 +76,24 @@ impl<'a> FlagsVerifier<'a> {
}
} else {
// Existing live-in flags should never be able to disappear.
assert_eq!(self.livein[ebb].expand(), None);
assert_eq!(self.livein[block].expand(), None);
}
}
Ok(())
}
/// Check flags usage in `ebb` and return the live-in flags value, if any.
fn visit_ebb(
/// Check flags usage in `block` and return the live-in flags value, if any.
fn visit_block(
&self,
ebb: ir::Ebb,
block: ir::Block,
errors: &mut VerifierErrors,
) -> VerifierStepResult<Option<ir::Value>> {
// The single currently live flags value.
let mut live_val = None;
// Visit instructions backwards so we can track liveness accurately.
for inst in self.func.layout.ebb_insts(ebb).rev() {
for inst in self.func.layout.block_insts(block).rev() {
// Check if `inst` interferes with existing live flags.
if let Some(live) = live_val {
for &res in self.func.dfg.inst_results(inst) {
@@ -130,7 +130,7 @@ impl<'a> FlagsVerifier<'a> {
}
}
// Include live-in flags to successor EBBs.
// Include live-in flags to successor blocks.
match self.func.dfg.analyze_branch(inst) {
BranchInfo::NotABranch => {}
BranchInfo::SingleDest(dest, _) => {