Mass rename Ebb and relatives to Block (#1365)

* Manually rename BasicBlock to BlockPredecessor

BasicBlock is a pair of (Ebb, Inst) that is used to represent the
basic block subcomponent of an Ebb that is a predecessor to an Ebb.

Eventually we will be able to remove this struct, but for now it
makes sense to give it a non-conflicting name so that we can start
to transition Ebb to represent a basic block.

I have not updated any comments that refer to BasicBlock, as
eventually we will remove BlockPredecessor and replace with Block,
which is a basic block, so the comments will become correct.

* Manually rename SSABuilder block types to avoid conflict

SSABuilder has its own Block and BlockData types. These along with
associated identifier will cause conflicts in a later commit, so
they are renamed to be more verbose here.

* Automatically rename 'Ebb' to 'Block' in *.rs

* Automatically rename 'EBB' to 'block' in *.rs

* Automatically rename 'ebb' to 'block' in *.rs

* Automatically rename 'extended basic block' to 'basic block' in *.rs

* Automatically rename 'an basic block' to 'a basic block' in *.rs

* Manually update comment for `Block`

`Block`'s wikipedia article required an update.

* Automatically rename 'an `Block`' to 'a `Block`' in *.rs

* Automatically rename 'extended_basic_block' to 'basic_block' in *.rs

* Automatically rename 'ebb' to 'block' in *.clif

* Manually rename clif constant that contains 'ebb' as substring to avoid conflict

* Automatically rename filecheck uses of 'EBB' to 'BB'

'regex: EBB' -> 'regex: BB'
'$EBB' -> '$BB'

* Automatically rename 'EBB' 'Ebb' to 'block' in *.clif

* Automatically rename 'an block' to 'a block' in *.clif

* Fix broken testcase when function name length increases

Test function names are limited to 16 characters. This causes
the new longer name to be truncated and fail a filecheck test. An
outdated comment was also fixed.
This commit is contained in:
Ryan Hunt
2020-02-07 10:46:47 -06:00
committed by GitHub
parent a136d1cb00
commit 832666c45e
370 changed files with 8090 additions and 7988 deletions

View File

@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ use log::debug;
/// Eliminate unreachable code.
///
/// This pass deletes whole EBBs that can't be reached from the entry block. It does not delete
/// This pass deletes whole blocks that can't be reached from the entry block. It does not delete
/// individual instructions whose results are unused.
///
/// The reachability analysis is performed by the dominator tree analysis.
@@ -20,27 +20,27 @@ pub fn eliminate_unreachable_code(
) {
let _tt = timing::unreachable_code();
let mut pos = FuncCursor::new(func);
while let Some(ebb) = pos.next_ebb() {
if domtree.is_reachable(ebb) {
while let Some(block) = pos.next_block() {
if domtree.is_reachable(block) {
continue;
}
debug!("Eliminating unreachable {}", ebb);
debug!("Eliminating unreachable {}", block);
// Move the cursor out of the way and make sure the next lop iteration goes to the right
// EBB.
pos.prev_ebb();
// block.
pos.prev_block();
// Remove all instructions from `ebb`.
while let Some(inst) = pos.func.layout.first_inst(ebb) {
// Remove all instructions from `block`.
while let Some(inst) = pos.func.layout.first_inst(block) {
debug!(" - {}", pos.func.dfg.display_inst(inst, None));
pos.func.layout.remove_inst(inst);
}
// Once the EBB is completely empty, we can update the CFG which removes it from any
// Once the block is completely empty, we can update the CFG which removes it from any
// predecessor lists.
cfg.recompute_ebb(pos.func, ebb);
cfg.recompute_block(pos.func, block);
// Finally, remove the EBB from the layout.
pos.func.layout.remove_ebb(ebb);
// Finally, remove the block from the layout.
pos.func.layout.remove_block(block);
}
}