x64: Take SIGFPE signals for divide traps (#6026)

* x64: Take SIGFPE signals for divide traps

Prior to this commit Wasmtime would configure `avoid_div_traps=true`
unconditionally for Cranelift. This, for the division-based
instructions, would change emitted code to explicitly trap on trap
conditions instead of letting the `div` x86 instruction trap.

There's no specific reason for Wasmtime, however, to specifically avoid
traps in the `div` instruction. This means that the extra generated
branches on x86 aren't necessary since the `div` and `idiv` instructions
already trap for similar conditions as wasm requires.

This commit instead disables the `avoid_div_traps` setting for
Wasmtime's usage of Cranelift. Subsequently the codegen rules were
updated slightly:

* When `avoid_div_traps=true`, traps are no longer emitted for `div`
  instructions.
* The `udiv`/`urem` instructions now list their trap as divide-by-zero
  instead of integer overflow.
* The lowering for `sdiv` was updated to still explicitly check for zero
  but the integer overflow case is deferred to the instruction itself.
* The lowering of `srem` no longer checks for zero and the listed trap
  for the `div` instruction is a divide-by-zero.

This means that the codegen for `udiv` and `urem` no longer have any
branches. The codegen for `sdiv` removes one branch but keeps the
zero-check to differentiate the two kinds of traps. The codegen for
`srem` removes one branch but keeps the -1 check since the semantics of
`srem` mismatch with the semantics of `idiv` with a -1 divisor
(specifically for INT_MIN).

This is unlikely to have really all that much of a speedup but was
something I noticed during #6008 which seemed like it'd be good to clean
up. Plus Wasmtime's signal handling was already set up to catch
`SIGFPE`, it was just never firing.

* Remove the `avoid_div_traps` cranelift setting

With no known users currently removing this should be possible and helps
simplify the x64 backend.

* x64: GC more support for avoid_div_traps

Remove the `validate_sdiv_divisor*` pseudo-instructions and clean up
some of the ISLE rules now that `div` is allowed to itself trap
unconditionally.

* x64: Store div trap code in instruction itself

* Keep divisors in registers, not in memory

Don't accidentally fold multiple traps together

* Handle EXC_ARITHMETIC on macos

* Update emit tests

* Update winch and tests
This commit is contained in:
Alex Crichton
2023-03-15 19:18:45 -05:00
committed by GitHub
parent 5ff2824ebb
commit 5ae8575296
72 changed files with 505 additions and 2624 deletions

View File

@@ -400,7 +400,18 @@ pub(crate) fn emit(
emit_std_enc_enc(sink, prefix, opcode, 1, subopcode, enc_src, rex_flags)
}
Inst::Div { sign, divisor, .. } | Inst::Div8 { sign, divisor, .. } => {
Inst::Div {
sign,
trap,
divisor,
..
}
| Inst::Div8 {
sign,
trap,
divisor,
..
} => {
let divisor = divisor.clone().to_reg_mem().with_allocs(allocs);
let size = match inst {
Inst::Div {
@@ -438,7 +449,7 @@ pub(crate) fn emit(
OperandSize::Size64 => (0xF7, LegacyPrefixes::None),
};
sink.add_trap(TrapCode::IntegerDivisionByZero);
sink.add_trap(*trap);
let subopcode = match sign {
DivSignedness::Signed => 7,
@@ -613,6 +624,7 @@ pub(crate) fn emit(
let inst = match size {
OperandSize::Size8 => Inst::div8(
DivSignedness::Signed,
TrapCode::IntegerDivisionByZero,
RegMem::reg(divisor),
Gpr::new(regs::rax()).unwrap(),
Writable::from_reg(Gpr::new(regs::rax()).unwrap()),
@@ -620,6 +632,7 @@ pub(crate) fn emit(
_ => Inst::div(
size,
DivSignedness::Signed,
TrapCode::IntegerDivisionByZero,
RegMem::reg(divisor),
Gpr::new(regs::rax()).unwrap(),
Gpr::new(regs::rdx()).unwrap(),
@@ -632,55 +645,6 @@ pub(crate) fn emit(
sink.bind_label(done_label);
}
Inst::ValidateSdivDivisor {
dividend, divisor, ..
}
| Inst::ValidateSdivDivisor64 {
dividend, divisor, ..
} => {
let orig_inst = &inst;
let divisor = allocs.next(divisor.to_reg());
let dividend = allocs.next(dividend.to_reg());
let size = match inst {
Inst::ValidateSdivDivisor { size, .. } => *size,
_ => OperandSize::Size64,
};
// First trap if the divisor is zero
let inst = Inst::cmp_rmi_r(size, RegMemImm::imm(0), divisor);
inst.emit(&[], sink, info, state);
let inst = Inst::trap_if(CC::Z, TrapCode::IntegerDivisionByZero);
inst.emit(&[], sink, info, state);
// Now check if the divisor is -1. If it is then additionally
// check if the dividend is INT_MIN. If it isn't then jump to the
// end. If both conditions here are true then trap.
let inst = Inst::cmp_rmi_r(size, RegMemImm::imm(0xffffffff), divisor);
inst.emit(&[], sink, info, state);
let done = sink.get_label();
one_way_jmp(sink, CC::NZ, done);
let int_min = match orig_inst {
Inst::ValidateSdivDivisor64 { tmp, .. } => {
let tmp = allocs.next(tmp.to_reg().to_reg());
let inst = Inst::imm(size, i64::MIN as u64, Writable::from_reg(tmp));
inst.emit(&[], sink, info, state);
RegMemImm::reg(tmp)
}
_ => RegMemImm::imm(match size {
OperandSize::Size8 => 0x80,
OperandSize::Size16 => 0x8000,
OperandSize::Size32 => 0x80000000,
OperandSize::Size64 => unreachable!(),
}),
};
let inst = Inst::cmp_rmi_r(size, int_min, dividend);
inst.emit(&[], sink, info, state);
let inst = Inst::trap_if(CC::Z, TrapCode::IntegerOverflow);
inst.emit(&[], sink, info, state);
sink.bind_label(done);
}
Inst::Imm {
dst_size,
simm64,