From 1f8921ef09667dc4319c1b65ebb1ce993e19badf Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Las Date: Wed, 1 Jan 2020 03:29:27 +0900 Subject: [PATCH] Fix typo in WASI-background.md (#755) "loose" -> "lose" "waidpid" -> "waitpid" --- docs/WASI-background.md | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/docs/WASI-background.md b/docs/WASI-background.md index 5c54200a01..9ba1d6a7f4 100644 --- a/docs/WASI-background.md +++ b/docs/WASI-background.md @@ -87,9 +87,9 @@ do we want to? It'd add a bunch of complexity, inefficiency, subtle behavioral differences, or realistically, a combination of all three. Ok, so maybe we can encourage applications to use `posix_spawn` instead. And -some already do, but in doing so we do loose some of the value of POSIX's +some already do, but in doing so we do lose some of the value of POSIX's momentum. And even with `posix_spawn`, many applications will explicitly do -things like `waidpid` on the resulting PID. We can make this work too, but +things like `waitpid` on the resulting PID. We can make this work too, but we should also take a moment and step back to think about IPC in general. In WebAssembly, instances can synchronously call each other, and it can be